Jim Cramb

32 papers receiving 401 citations

Peers

Jim Cramb
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
  • Radiation 261
  • Otorhinolaryngology 44
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 145
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 99
  • Speech and Hearing 18
Replace Brent C. Parker with:
Brent C. Parker United States
D. Hoffmans Netherlands
Claus Chunli Yang United States
G.J. Webster United Kingdom
S. Bresciani Italy
E. Rondi Italy
Xenia Ray United States
Irina Fotina Austria
Georgios Ioannidis Greece
Tara A. van de Water Netherlands
Jim Cramb relative to Brent C. Parker United States Brent C. Parker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Brent C. Parker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jim Cramb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jim Cramb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jim Cramb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jim Cramb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jim Cramb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jim Cramb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jim Cramb. The network helps show where Jim Cramb may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jim Cramb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jim Cramb Line = papers co-authored together Jim Cramb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200764
2 201236
3 201235
4 200932
5 201230
6 201027
7 200920
8 201320
9 200816
10 201114
11 199012
12 201510
13 201010
14 20119
15 20149
16 20028
17 20147
18 20046
19 20126
20 20116

About Jim Cramb

Jim Cramb is a scholar working on Radiation, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Otorhinolaryngology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 32 papers that have together received 412 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (20 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (6 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (4 papers), Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (4 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (3 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiation (261 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (44 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (145 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (99 citations) and Speech and Hearing (18 citations). Jim Cramb has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tomas Kron, Farshad Foroudi, Alvin Milner, June Corry, Annette Haworth, Lester J. Peters, Tsien Fua, Gillian Duchesne, Daniel Pham and Suki Gill. Their work appears in journals such as Medical dosimetry, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Medical Physics, Radiation Oncology and British Journal of Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact