Jianjun Ge

411 citations
20 papers · 318 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Jianjun Ge

19 papers receiving 313 citations

Peers

Jianjun Ge
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Biophysics 23
  • Cancer Research 44
  • Pharmaceutical Science 18
  • Biomedical Engineering 116
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 41
Replace Anna Drożdż with:
Anna Drożdż Poland
Xiyu Zhu China
Marie Guilbert France
Aline Zbinden Germany
Jinglin Guo China
Wenkun Bai China
Simon Ströbel Switzerland
Chengeng Yang United States
Preety Rawal India
Aragaw Gebeyehu United States
Jianjun Ge relative to Anna Drożdż Poland Anna Drożdż's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Anna Drożdż · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jianjun Ge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jianjun Ge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jianjun Ge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jianjun Ge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jianjun Ge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jianjun Ge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jianjun Ge. The network helps show where Jianjun Ge may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jianjun Ge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jianjun Ge Line = papers co-authored together Jianjun Ge links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201783
2 202170
3 202152
4 202020
5 201315
6 202314
7 202211
8 20188
9 20238
10
[Effects of substance-partitioned moxibustion on plasma beta-EP content in the patient with primary dysmenorrhea of cold-damp stagnation type in the menstrual period].
20086
11 20206
12 20216
13 20245
14 20244
15 20213
16 20203
17 20222
18 20241
19 20241
20 20260

About Jianjun Ge

Jianjun Ge is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering, Oncology, Biomaterials and Surgery, having authored 20 papers that have together received 318 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (5 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (2 papers), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (2 papers), Extracellular vesicles in disease (2 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (2 papers), Image Enhancement Techniques (1 paper), S100 Proteins and Annexins (1 paper) and Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (23 citations), Cancer Research (44 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (18 citations), Biomedical Engineering (116 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (41 citations). Jianjun Ge has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Peng Shi, Wei Cao, Xiaowei Sun, Zaozao Chen, Shiqi Sun, Huan Ye, Qiwei Li, Fei Wang, Yu‐Chuan Yan and Zhongze Gu. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nanobiotechnology, Bioactive Materials, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, Pharmacological Research and BMC Cardiovascular Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact