Jethro Dowell

474 citations
10 papers · 323 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Jethro Dowell

9 papers receiving 316 citations

Peers

Jethro Dowell
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology 16
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 277
  • Aerospace Engineering 86
  • Computational Mathematics 2
  • Artificial Intelligence 107
Replace Yanling Guo with:
Yanling Guo China
José Andrade Portugal
Corinna Möhrlen United States
Emil B. Iversen Denmark
H. J. Lu Taiwan
Xuri Song China
Mucun Sun United States
Bri-Mathias Hodge United States
Ladislav Zjavka Czechia
Zhaoshuang He China
Jethro Dowell relative to Yanling Guo China Yanling Guo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Yanling Guo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jethro Dowell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jethro Dowell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jethro Dowell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jethro Dowell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jethro Dowell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jethro Dowell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jethro Dowell. The network helps show where Jethro Dowell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Jethro Dowell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jethro Dowell Line = papers co-authored together Jethro Dowell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2015236
2 201335
3 201516
4 201311
5 20168
6 20147
7 20144
8 20154
9 20132
10
Improved Spatial Modelling of Wind Fields
20130

About Jethro Dowell

Jethro Dowell is a scholar working on Environmental Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Automotive Engineering and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 10 papers that have together received 323 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wind and Air Flow Studies (6 papers), Energy Load and Power Forecasting (6 papers), Wind Energy Research and Development (5 papers), Reliability and Maintenance Optimization (2 papers), Power System Reliability and Maintenance (2 papers), Vehicle Noise and Vibration Control (2 papers), Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing (1 paper) and Electric Power System Optimization (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Energy Engineering and Power Technology (16 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (277 citations), Aerospace Engineering (86 citations), Computational Mathematics (2 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (107 citations). Jethro Dowell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Pierre Pinson, David Infield, Stephan Weiss, David Hill, Simon Gill, John M. Quigley, Keith Bell, Victoria M. Catterson, David McMillan and Iain Dinwoodie. Their work appears in journals such as Wind Energy, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) and INFM-OAR (INFN Catania).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact