Jérôme Molette

15 papers receiving 294 citations

Peers

Jérôme Molette
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Physiology 131
  • Neurology 60
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 40
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 53
  • Organic Chemistry 77
Replace Daniel K. Cashion with:
Daniel K. Cashion United States
Yvan Varisco Switzerland
Selena Milicevic Sephton United Kingdom
Natalie Beschörner Denmark
Akihiko Fujikawa Japan
Mònica Aparici Spain
Andreas Schildan Germany
Anders Bråthe Norway
José-Ignacio Andrés Belgium
Izaak den Daas Netherlands
Jérôme Molette relative to Daniel K. Cashion United States Daniel K. Cashion's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Daniel K. Cashion · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jérôme Molette

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jérôme Molette's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jérôme Molette with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jérôme Molette more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jérôme Molette

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jérôme Molette. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jérôme Molette. The network helps show where Jérôme Molette may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jérôme Molette, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jérôme Molette Line = papers co-authored together Jérôme Molette links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2019143
2 201338
3 201124
4 200821
5 202115
6 20228
7 20208
8 20217
9 20217
10 20086
11 20176
12 20205
13 20225
14 20172
15 20091

About Jérôme Molette

Jérôme Molette is a scholar working on Physiology, Organic Chemistry, Neurology, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 15 papers that have together received 296 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (7 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (4 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (3 papers), Fluorine in Organic Chemistry (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers) and Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (131 citations), Neurology (60 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (40 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (53 citations) and Organic Chemistry (77 citations). Jérôme Molette has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include Francesca Capotosti, Andrea Pfeifer, David T. Hickman, Andrew Stephens, Heiko Kroth, Felix Oden, Heribert Schmitt‐Willich, Mathias Berndt, Ludger M. Dinkelborg and André Mueller. Their work appears in journals such as Alzheimer s & Dementia, Tetrahedron Letters, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Tetrahedron.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact