Jeremiah E. Scott

34 papers receiving 463 citations

Peers

Jeremiah E. Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Paleontology 184
  • Anthropology 145
  • Developmental Biology 25
  • Social Psychology 203
  • Geometry and Topology 73
Replace James D. Pampush with:
James D. Pampush United States
Justin A. Ledogar United States
Janine Chalk United States
Rachel A. Menegaz United States
Laura C. Fitton United Kingdom
Samuel N. Cobb United Kingdom
Claire E. Terhune United States
Ashley S. Hammond United States
M. Loring Burgess United States
Luci Ann P. Kohn United States
Jeremiah E. Scott relative to James D. Pampush United States James D. Pampush's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
James D. Pampush · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jeremiah E. Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jeremiah E. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeremiah E. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeremiah E. Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jeremiah E. Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeremiah E. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeremiah E. Scott. The network helps show where Jeremiah E. Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jeremiah E. Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jeremiah E. Scott Line = papers co-authored together Jeremiah E. Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201436
2 200935
3 201233
4 201529
5 201428
6 201526
7 200626
8 201123
9 201620
10 201719
11 200918
12 202017
13 201315
14 200915
15 200415
16 200715
17 201813
18 201312
19 201712
20 201212

About Jeremiah E. Scott

Jeremiah E. Scott is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Paleontology, Anthropology, Ecology and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 34 papers that have together received 478 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primate Behavior and Ecology (22 papers), Evolution and Paleontology Studies (15 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (10 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (8 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (6 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (5 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (3 papers) and Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Paleontology (184 citations), Anthropology (145 citations), Developmental Biology (25 citations), Social Psychology (203 citations) and Geometry and Topology (73 citations). Jeremiah E. Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Matthew J. Ravosa, Kevin R. McAbee, Curtis W. Marean, Charles A. Lockwood, Jay Kelley, Kristi Lewton, Rachel A. Menegaz, David J. Daegling, Claire E. Terhune and Frederick E. Grine. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Human Evolution, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Journal of Experimental Biology, The Anatomical Record and Journal of Visualized Experiments.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact