Jeremiah E. Scott

34 papers receiving 516 citations

Peers

Jeremiah E. Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Paleontology 200
  • Anthropology 162
  • Developmental Biology 28
  • Social Psychology 243
  • Geometry and Topology 83
Replace James D. Pampush with:
James D. Pampush United States
Janine Chalk United States
Rachel A. Menegaz United States
Caitlin M. Schrein United States
Justin A. Ledogar United States
Claire E. Terhune United States
Russell T. Hogg United States
Jordi Galbany Spain
Samuel N. Cobb United Kingdom
Ashley S. Hammond United States
Jeremiah E. Scott relative to James D. Pampush United States James D. Pampush's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
James D. Pampush · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jeremiah E. Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jeremiah E. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeremiah E. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeremiah E. Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jeremiah E. Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeremiah E. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeremiah E. Scott. The network helps show where Jeremiah E. Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jeremiah E. Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jeremiah E. Scott Line = papers co-authored together Jeremiah E. Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201471
2 200939
3 201236
4 201530
5 201428
6 200628
7 201528
8 201126
9 200421
10 200920
11 201620
12 201719
13 200919
14 202017
15 200717
16 201217
17 201716
18 201315
19 201815
20 201312

About Jeremiah E. Scott

Jeremiah E. Scott is a scholar working on Paleontology, Social Psychology, Anthropology, Developmental Biology and Ecology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 558 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primate Behavior and Ecology (22 papers), Evolution and Paleontology Studies (15 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (10 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (8 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (6 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (5 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (3 papers) and Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Paleontology (200 citations), Anthropology (162 citations), Developmental Biology (28 citations), Social Psychology (243 citations) and Geometry and Topology (83 citations). Jeremiah E. Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Matthew J. Ravosa, Kevin R. McAbee, Curtis W. Marean, Charles A. Lockwood, Kristi Lynn Lewton, Rachel A. Menegaz, Caitlin M. Schrein, David J. Daegling, Jay Kelley and Danielle Royer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Human Evolution, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Journal of Experimental Biology, Journal of Visualized Experiments and The Anatomical Record.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact