Danielle Royer

28 papers receiving 265 citations

Peers

Danielle Royer
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 62
  • Anthropology 73
  • Archeology 67
  • Paleontology 45
  • Health Informatics 7
Replace Per Holck with:
Per Holck Norway
Shelley L. Smith United States
Véronique Alunni France
Francesco M. Galassi Italy
Yves Schuliar France
Wendy Birch United Kingdom
Fadil Elamin Sudan
Jason M. Wiersema United States
Célia Kremer Canada
Helen K. Kurki Canada
Danielle Royer relative to Per Holck Norway Per Holck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×24×
Per Holck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Royer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Royer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Royer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Royer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Royer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Royer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Royer. The network helps show where Danielle Royer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Royer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle Royer Line = papers co-authored together Danielle Royer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200847
2 201633
3 201729
4 201624
5 202023
6 201919
7 200915
8 201713
9 200811
10 200711
11 20179
12 20184
13 20204
14 20204
15 20204
16 20164
17 20194
18 20252
19 20172
20
Morphometric Variation in the Appendicular Skeleton of Recent and Prehistoric Humans
20092

About Danielle Royer

Danielle Royer is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 29 papers that have together received 273 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (13 papers), Anatomy and Medical Technology (11 papers), Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (6 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (5 papers), Radiology practices and education (5 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (4 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (3 papers) and Medical and Biological Sciences (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (62 citations), Anthropology (73 citations), Archeology (67 citations), Paleontology (45 citations) and Health Informatics (7 citations). Danielle Royer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Saint Kitts and Nevis. Frequent co-authors include Frederick E. Grine, John G. Fleagle, Osbjorn M. Pearson, John Kendall, Ross Kessler, Amanda Meyer, Claire F. Smith, Catherine Hennessy, Maureen E. Stabio and Charles A. Lockwood. Their work appears in journals such as The FASEB Journal, Anatomical Sciences Education, Journal of Human Evolution, Clinical Anatomy and Diabetes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact