Jenna Khan

23 papers receiving 286 citations

Peers

Jenna Khan
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Health Informatics 10
  • Cancer Research 47
  • Hematology 35
  • Internal Medicine 7
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 10
Replace Guorong Wang with:
Guorong Wang China
Wesley Furnback United States
Hengye Huang China
Filiz Çay Şenler Türkiye
Bachar Manav Greece
D. Pei United States
Dinee C. Simpson United States
Michael Xu Canada
Manuela Neri Italy
Mehmet Muhittin Yalçın Türkiye
Jenna Khan relative to Guorong Wang China Guorong Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Guorong Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jenna Khan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jenna Khan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jenna Khan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jenna Khan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jenna Khan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jenna Khan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jenna Khan. The network helps show where Jenna Khan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jenna Khan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jenna Khan Line = papers co-authored together Jenna Khan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201757
2 201337
3 201934
4 201331
5 201823
6
Geographic and sociodemographic disparities in drive times to Joint Commission-certified primary stroke centers in North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia.
201120
7 201919
8 201817
9 202010
10 201810
11 20209
12 20167
13 20225
14
Geographic and Sociodemographic Disparities in Drive Times to Joint Commission-Certified Primary Stroke Centers in North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia ORIGINAL RESEARCH
20114
15 20212
16 20222
17 20122
18 20251
19 20241
20 20221

About Jenna Khan

Jenna Khan is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Genetics, Rehabilitation, Oncology and Physiology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 295 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (3 papers), Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (2 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (2 papers), Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (2 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (2 papers), Blood donation and transfusion practices (1 paper), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (1 paper) and Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (10 citations), Cancer Research (47 citations), Hematology (35 citations), Internal Medicine (7 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (10 citations). Jenna Khan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Christina M. Lockwood, Joshua A. Lieberman, Emily F. Conant, Garth H. Rauscher, Michael L. Berbaum, Wayne L. Chandler, Meghan Delaney, Dina N. Greene, Zil Goldstein and Robert L. Schmidt. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Clinical Pathology, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, Transfusion, Clinical Chemistry and Transfusion Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact