Jeffrey Walker

1.3k citations
34 papers · 375 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Jeffrey Walker

28 papers receiving 306 citations

Peers

Jeffrey Walker
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Philosophy 101
  • Literature and Literary Theory 79
  • Classics 16
  • Sensory Systems 20
  • Anthropology 36
Replace W. Witte with:
W. Witte Germany
Rachel M. Brownstein United States
Thomas Cole United States
Emily Dickinson United States
Paul Wexler Israel
Ríchard H. Lawson United States
Rebecca Flemming United Kingdom
Philip Horne United Kingdom
Max Harris United States
Chantal Zabus France
Jeffrey Walker relative to W. Witte Germany W. Witte's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.3×
W. Witte · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jeffrey Walker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jeffrey Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeffrey Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeffrey Walker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jeffrey Walker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeffrey Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeffrey Walker. The network helps show where Jeffrey Walker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jeffrey Walker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jeffrey Walker Line = papers co-authored together Jeffrey Walker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200071
2 199749
3 199449
4 201532
5 200932
6 198022
7 200720
8 201718
9 20128
10 19808
11 19898
12 20197
13 20197
14 19957
15 20067
16 19894
17 19964
18 20164
19 19903
20 20042

About Jeffrey Walker

Jeffrey Walker is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy, Anthropology, Classics and Surgery, having authored 34 papers that have together received 375 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rhetoric and Communication Studies (8 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (4 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (4 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (4 papers), Medieval Literature and History (3 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (2 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (2 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (101 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (79 citations), Classics (16 citations), Sensory Systems (20 citations) and Anthropology (36 citations). Jeffrey Walker has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Frederick G. Hayden, John J. Treanor, Elizabeth K. Hussey, Bruce I. Turetsky, Paul J. Moberg, Raquel E. Gur, Patrick Crutchley, Ulrich Schmidt, Rodney A. Gabriel and Jason D. Maguire. Their work appears in journals such as College English, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, American Literature, The Journal of Arthroplasty and Philosophy and Rhetoric.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact