Jeff Calder

35 papers receiving 333 citations

Peers

Jeff Calder
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Statistics and Probability 61
  • Mathematical Physics 52
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 90
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 106
  • Geometry and Topology 35
Replace Kurt Jetter with:
Kurt Jetter Germany
Nicolas Papadakis France
Carlos F. Borges United States
Dmitry Vorotnikov Portugal
Shai Dekel Israel
Rong Qing Jia Canada
Lee W. Johnson United States
Hartmut Führ Germany
Aasa Feragen Denmark
Aurél Galántai Hungary
Jeff Calder relative to Kurt Jetter Germany Kurt Jetter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Kurt Jetter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jeff Calder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jeff Calder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeff Calder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeff Calder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jeff Calder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeff Calder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeff Calder. The network helps show where Jeff Calder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jeff Calder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jeff Calder Line = papers co-authored together Jeff Calder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200930
2 197130
3 201029
4 201827
5 202221
6 202117
7 201816
8 202015
9 202214
10
Lipschitz regularized Deep Neural Networks converge and generalize
201813
11 201413
12 201113
13 201512
14 197312
15 202012
16 202210
17 202210
18 20199
19 20219
20 19708

About Jeff Calder

Jeff Calder is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Statistics and Probability, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Mathematical Physics and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 41 papers that have together received 374 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods and Inference (6 papers), Machine Learning and Algorithms (6 papers), Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning (4 papers), Numerical methods in inverse problems (3 papers), Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques (3 papers), Point processes and geometric inequalities (3 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (61 citations), Mathematical Physics (52 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (90 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (106 citations) and Geometry and Topology (35 citations). Jeff Calder has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Anthony Yezzi, A.-R. Mansouri, Nicolás García Trillos, Alfred O. Hero, Rachid Deriche, Maxime Descoteaux, Selim Esedoḡlu, Dejan Slepčev, Adam M. Oberman and Charles K. Smart. Their work appears in journals such as SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Medical Image Analysis and SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact