Jeff Calder

40 papers receiving 408 citations

Peers

Jeff Calder
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Statistics and Probability 62
  • Mathematical Physics 56
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 127
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 98
  • Geometry and Topology 37
Replace Marc Bernot with:
Marc Bernot France
Ognyan Kounchev Bulgaria
Lénaïc Chizat France
Mauro Piccioni Italy
Kurt Jetter Germany
Nicolas Papadakis France
Dmitry Vorotnikov Portugal
Shai Dekel Israel
M.R. Eslahchi Iran
Jeff Calder relative to Marc Bernot France Marc Bernot's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Marc Bernot · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jeff Calder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jeff Calder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeff Calder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeff Calder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jeff Calder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeff Calder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeff Calder. The network helps show where Jeff Calder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jeff Calder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jeff Calder Line = papers co-authored together Jeff Calder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197137
2 200935
3 201832
4 201031
5 202226
6 201818
7 202117
8 202215
9 202215
10 202015
11 201515
12
1Pareto-depth for Multiple-query Image Retrieval
201614
13 201414
14 201114
15
Lipschitz regularized Deep Neural Networks converge and generalize
201813
16 197313
17 202212
18 202012
19 202111
20 202211

About Jeff Calder

Jeff Calder is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Statistics and Probability, Mathematical Physics and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 46 papers that have together received 453 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods and Inference (6 papers), Machine Learning and Algorithms (6 papers), Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning (4 papers), Point processes and geometric inequalities (3 papers), Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods (3 papers), Numerical methods in inverse problems (3 papers), Advanced Image Processing Techniques (3 papers) and Optimization and Variational Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (62 citations), Mathematical Physics (56 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (127 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (98 citations) and Geometry and Topology (37 citations). Jeff Calder has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Alfred O. Hero, Nicolás García Trillos, Anthony Yezzi, A.-R. Mansouri, Rachid Deriche, Maxime Descoteaux, Selim Esedoḡlu, Ko-Jen Hsiao, Dejan Slepčev and Adam M. Oberman. Their work appears in journals such as SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences and Transactions of the American Mathematical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact