Jeff Blackmer

19 papers receiving 341 citations

Peers

Jeff Blackmer
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 121
  • Rehabilitation 21
  • Occupational Therapy 12
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 78
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 15
Replace R. Goy with:
R. Goy Canada
Lucile L. Adams United States
Rita Santos Portugal
Rita S. Guerra Portugal
T Sluis Netherlands
Peter Kiencke Germany
Lorenzo Spizzichino Italy
Katherine A. Pohlman United States
Anthony J. Lisi United States
Markku Hupli Finland
Jeff Blackmer relative to R. Goy Canada R. Goy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
R. Goy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jeff Blackmer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jeff Blackmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeff Blackmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeff Blackmer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jeff Blackmer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeff Blackmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeff Blackmer. The network helps show where Jeff Blackmer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jeff Blackmer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jeff Blackmer Line = papers co-authored together Jeff Blackmer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Rehabilitation medicine: 1. Autonomic dysreflexia.
200388
2 199743
3 199731
4 201723
5 200622
6 200021
7 201420
8 200320
9 200219
10 201315
11 200112
12 202011
13 200410
14 20106
15 20076
16
Autonomic dysreflexia and telehealth.
20066
17 20194
18 20143
19 20092
20 20141

About Jeff Blackmer

Jeff Blackmer is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 21 papers that have together received 363 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (4 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (3 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (2 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (2 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (1 paper) and Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (121 citations), Rehabilitation (21 citations), Occupational Therapy (12 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (78 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (15 citations). Jeff Blackmer has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Shawn Marshall, Keith G. Wilson, Dorothyann Curran, Sam D. Shemie, Sylvia Torrance, Christy Simpson, Ronald Labonté, Sonny Dhanani, Corinne Packer and Hillel M. Finestone. Their work appears in journals such as World Medical & Health Policy, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques, Pain Research and Management, Health Policy and Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact