Jean E. Hampton

2.9k citations
48 papers · 1.5k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Jean E. Hampton

40 papers receiving 981 citations

Peers

Jean E. Hampton
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Philosophy 618
  • Political Science and International Relations 582
  • General Decision Sciences 39
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 301
  • Law 138
Replace David Owen Brink with:
David Owen Brink United States
Thomas Hurka Canada
Niko Kolodny United States
George Sher United States
Henry Sidgwick United Kingdom
Bernard Williams United Kingdom
Larry A. May United States
David Copp United States
Kasper Lippert‐Rasmussen Denmark
Samuel Freeman United States
Jean E. Hampton relative to David Owen Brink United States David Owen Brink's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
David Owen Brink · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jean E. Hampton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jean E. Hampton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jean E. Hampton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jean E. Hampton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jean E. Hampton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jean E. Hampton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jean E. Hampton. The network helps show where Jean E. Hampton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Jean E. Hampton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jean E. Hampton Line = papers co-authored together Jean E. Hampton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988264
2 1987212
3 1989111
4 199383
5 199878
6 198868
7 199560
8 198759
9 198859
10 198051
11 199447
12 200642
13 201739
14 199830
15 198930
16 199120
17 199919
18 199518
19 199418
20 199517

About Jean E. Hampton

Jean E. Hampton is a scholar working on Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations, Law, Safety Research and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (11 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (10 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers), Free Will and Agency (3 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (2 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (2 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (618 citations), Political Science and International Relations (582 citations), General Decision Sciences (39 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (301 citations) and Law (138 citations). Jean E. Hampton has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrie G. Murphy, Stephen Darwall, Jon Elster, Philip N. Pettit, Joshua Dressler, Patrick C. Riley, David Gauthier, Gregory S. Kavka, A. John Simmons and Arthur Ripstein. Their work appears in journals such as Social Philosophy and Policy, The Philosophical Review, Economics and Philosophy, The Journal of Philosophy and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact