Jay O’Laughlin

27 papers receiving 306 citations

Peers

Jay O’Laughlin
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Global and Planetary Change 194
  • Soil Science 58
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 60
  • Ecology 101
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 33
Replace Jelle G. van Minnen with:
Jelle G. van Minnen Netherlands
Alan A. Lucier United States
Emily McGlynn United States
Deying Xu China
M.F. Ricard Argentina
Guolong Hou China
Teresa Sauras‐Yera Spain
Jesse Caputo United States
Syed Moazzam Nizami Pakistan
William C. Stewart United States
Jay O’Laughlin relative to Jelle G. van Minnen Netherlands Jelle G. van Minnen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Jelle G. van Minnen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jay O’Laughlin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jay O’Laughlin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay O’Laughlin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay O’Laughlin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jay O’Laughlin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay O’Laughlin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay O’Laughlin. The network helps show where Jay O’Laughlin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Jay O’Laughlin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jay O’Laughlin Line = papers co-authored together Jay O’Laughlin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201471
2
200962
3 199436
4 199531
5 200528
6
Natural Resource Policy
201623
7 200316
8
Buffer strip design for protecting water quality and fish habitat
199415
9 200511
10 20059
11 20119
12 19918
13 20048
14 19827
15 19944
16 19844
17 19833
18 19892
19 19942
20 19882

About Jay O’Laughlin

Jay O’Laughlin is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Ecology and Insect Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 361 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Management and Policy (15 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (7 papers), Forest ecology and management (4 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (4 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (4 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (2 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (2 papers) and Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (194 citations), Soil Science (58 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (60 citations), Ecology (101 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (33 citations). Jay O’Laughlin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Malawi and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Frequent co-authors include Philip S. Cook, Roger A. Sedjo, Robert W. Malmsheimer, Markus Nils Peterson, Reid A. Miner, Marilyn A. Buford, Frederick W. Cubbage, Kenneth E. Skog, Robert C. Abt and Jim L. Bowyer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Forestry, Journal of Sustainable Forestry, Forest Ecology and Management, Southern Journal of Applied Forestry and Western Journal of Applied Forestry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact