Jay Nath
Impact in
- Transplantation top 2%
- Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
- Hepatology top 10%
- Liver Disease and Transplantation
Papers in
- Surgery 18
- Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes 14
-
- Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments 18
- Co-authors
- Andrew Ready (15 shared papers)Nicholas Inston (16 shared papers)James Hodson (14 shared papers)Christian Ludwig (10 shared papers)Adnan Sharif (21 shared papers)Daniel A. Tennant (5 shared papers)Thomas B. Smith (6 shared papers)Philippe Tanière (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Transplantation (4 papers)American Journal of Transplantation (2 papers)Transplant International (2 papers)British journal of surgery (2 papers)Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomBelgiumSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Jay Nath
50 papers receiving 636 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Transplantation 204
- Hepatology 101
- Surgery 324
- Emergency Medical Services 38
- Nephrology 40
Countries citing papers authored by Jay Nath
This map shows the geographic impact of Jay Nath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay Nath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay Nath more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jay Nath
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay Nath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay Nath. The network helps show where Jay Nath may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jay Nath, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 57 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 47 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 45 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 38 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 37 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 32 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 29 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 28 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 23 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 21 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 20 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 16 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 16 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 14 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 13 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 13 | |
| 20 | 2016 | 12 |
About Jay Nath
Jay Nath is a scholar working on Surgery, Transplantation, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Hepatology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 52 papers that have together received 653 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (18 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (14 papers), Organ Donation and Transplantation (8 papers), Liver Disease and Transplantation (6 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (3 papers), Polyomavirus and related diseases (3 papers), Renal and Vascular Pathologies (2 papers) and Viral-associated cancers and disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (204 citations), Hepatology (101 citations), Surgery (324 citations), Emergency Medical Services (38 citations) and Nephrology (40 citations). Jay Nath has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Ready, Nicholas Inston, James Hodson, Christian Ludwig, Adnan Sharif, Daniel A. Tennant, Thomas B. Smith, Philippe Tanière, Krishna Moorthy and Derek Alderson. Their work appears in journals such as Transplantation, American Journal of Transplantation, Transplant International, British journal of surgery and Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.