Jay Luvaas

648 citations
33 papers · 284 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Jay Luvaas

24 papers receiving 154 citations

Peers

Jay Luvaas
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Political Science and International Relations 202
  • Space and Planetary Science 5
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies 2
  • History 23
  • Anthropology 20
Replace C. P. Stacey with:
C. P. Stacey Canada
Kenneth Bourne United Kingdom
Esmonde M. Robertson United Kingdom
Richard W. Leopold United States
Richard W. Van Alstyne United States
Forrest C. Pogue United States
Jack M. Sosin United States
William G. Hyland United States
Mark A. Stoler United States
Charles R. Ritcheson United States
Jay Luvaas relative to C. P. Stacey Canada C. P. Stacey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
C. P. Stacey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jay Luvaas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jay Luvaas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay Luvaas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay Luvaas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jay Luvaas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay Luvaas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay Luvaas. The network helps show where Jay Luvaas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Jay Luvaas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jay Luvaas Line = papers co-authored together Jay Luvaas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1974166
2 196521
3 196017
4
Frederick the Great on the Art of War
196611
5 196411
6 19796
7 19656
8 19735
9 19605
10 19864
11 19993
12 19883
13
Liddell Hart and the Mearsheimer Critique: A "Pupil's" Retrospective
19903
14 19822
15 19602
16 19992
17 19622
18 19612
19 19822
20 19972

About Jay Luvaas

Jay Luvaas is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, History, Sociology and Political Science, History and Philosophy of Science and Marketing, having authored 33 papers that have together received 284 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Military History and Strategy (10 papers), European Political History Analysis (6 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (6 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (6 papers), World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact (6 papers), Canadian Identity and History (3 papers), Military, Security, and Education Studies (3 papers) and Australian History and Society (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (202 citations), Space and Planetary Science (5 citations), Life-span and Life-course Studies (2 citations), History (23 citations) and Anthropology (20 citations). Jay Luvaas has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Russell F. Weigley, Francis L. Loewenheim, Robin Higham, D. Clayton James, Owen Connelly, Richard A. Preston, Eliot A. Cohen, David A. Armstrong, Grady McWhiney and Charles L. Dufour. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Southern History, The American Historical Review, Intelligence & National Security, Foreign Affairs and The Journal of Military History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact