Janis Kim

24 papers receiving 408 citations

Peers

Janis Kim
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Rehabilitation 128
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 80
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 142
  • Biomedical Engineering 165
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 45
Replace Nina Lefeber with:
Nina Lefeber Belgium
Carrie L. Peterson United States
Laura Wallard France
Alice De Luca Italy
Clinton J. Wutzke United States
Benjamin C. Conner United States
Douglas N. Savin United States
Iris Fisher Israel
Valerie J. Eberly United States
Daniele Galafate Italy
Janis Kim relative to Nina Lefeber Belgium Nina Lefeber's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Nina Lefeber · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janis Kim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janis Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janis Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janis Kim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janis Kim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janis Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janis Kim. The network helps show where Janis Kim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Janis Kim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janis Kim Line = papers co-authored together Janis Kim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201863
2 201447
3 201744
4 201735
5 202031
6 201727
7 201818
8 202117
9 201717
10 201815
11 201615
12 201815
13 201914
14 201611
15 20149
16 20199
17 20198
18 20178
19 20194
20 20223

About Janis Kim

Janis Kim is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Biomedical Engineering, Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 24 papers that have together received 416 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (10 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (7 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (6 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (5 papers), Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (5 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (3 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (1 paper) and Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (128 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (80 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (142 citations), Biomedical Engineering (165 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (45 citations). Janis Kim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include Ming Wu, Andrew Sawers, Brian J. Hafner, Deborah Gaebler‐Spira, Brian D. Schmit, Matthew J. Major, Chao‐Jung Hsu, Rongnian Tang, Jill M. Landry and Sheng‐Che Yen. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Disability and Rehabilitation, The FASEB Journal and Neural Plasticity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact