Janice E. Sojka

37 papers receiving 634 citations

Peers

Janice E. Sojka
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Equine 307
  • Small Animals 130
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 140
  • Nephrology 36
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 69
Replace Natalie Norton with:
Natalie Norton United States
Charlotte Sandersen Belgium
Lon D. Lewis United States
Eleanor M. Green United States
Erica C. McKenzie United States
T. J. Divers United States
Ana Muñoz Spain
Jennifer M. MacLeay United States
John P. Loftus United States
David G. Bristol United States
Janice E. Sojka relative to Natalie Norton United States Natalie Norton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Natalie Norton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janice E. Sojka

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janice E. Sojka's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janice E. Sojka with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janice E. Sojka more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janice E. Sojka

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janice E. Sojka. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janice E. Sojka. The network helps show where Janice E. Sojka may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janice E. Sojka, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janice E. Sojka Line = papers co-authored together Janice E. Sojka links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200976
2 200870
3 198849
4 199345
5 201135
6 200034
7 198633
8 200232
9 200128
10 199728
11 200222
12 199522
13 200321
14
Use of ultrafiltration probes in sheep to collect interstitial fluid for measurement of calcium and magnesium.
200020
15 199918
16 199817
17 200216
18 200016
19 200314
20 199014

About Janice E. Sojka

Janice E. Sojka is a scholar working on Equine, Agronomy and Crop Science, Small Animals, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, having authored 38 papers that have together received 740 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Veterinary Equine Medical Research (22 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (6 papers), Magnesium in Health and Disease (3 papers), Exercise and Physiological Responses (3 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (2 papers), Animal health and immunology (2 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (2 papers) and Bone health and osteoporosis research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (307 citations), Small Animals (130 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (140 citations), Nephrology (36 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (69 citations). Janice E. Sojka has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Paraguay and China. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas Frank, Mickey A. Latour, G. D. Bottoms, Margaret Johnson, George E. Moore, Leisa Jackson, Scott A. Brown, Margaret A. Miller, Ingrid D. Pardo and Jan F. Hawkins. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Veterinary Research, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, Veterinary Clinics of North America Equine Practice and Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact