Janet Thomas

91 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Janet Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Applied Psychology 198
  • Physiology 964
  • Health 168
  • General Health Professions 451
  • Pharmacy 77
Replace Claudia R. Pischke with:
Claudia R. Pischke Germany
Sheila F. Castañeda United States
Jennifer Irvin Vidrine United States
Arlene Michaels Miller United States
Jennifer A. Fidler United Kingdom
Luis G. Escobedo United States
Kolawole S. Okuyemi United States
Rebecca J. Donatelle United States
Anna‐Lena Undén Sweden
Christie A. Befort United States
Janet Thomas relative to Claudia R. Pischke Germany Claudia R. Pischke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Claudia R. Pischke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janet Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Thomas. The network helps show where Janet Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janet Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janet Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Janet Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 94 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001184
2 2003135
3 200892
4 200691
5 201387
6 200686
7 200682
8 200674
9 200766
10 201066
11 201664
12 201152
13 201150
14 201143
15 198643
16 200939
17 201339
18 201238
19 200435
20 200635

About Janet Thomas

Janet Thomas is a scholar working on Physiology, General Health Professions, Applied Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Molecular Biology, having authored 94 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (57 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (13 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (10 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (9 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (4 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (3 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (3 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (198 citations), Physiology (964 citations), Health (168 citations), General Health Professions (451 citations) and Pharmacy (77 citations). Janet Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Vietnam and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jasjit S. Ahluwalia, Phillip J. Brantley, Glenn N. Jones, Isabel C. Scarinci, Kolawole S. Okuyemi, Christi A. Patten, Nicole L. Nollen, Carla J. Berg, Lawrence C. An and Hongfei Guo. Their work appears in journals such as Nicotine & Tobacco Research, Addictive Behaviors, American Journal of Health Behavior, Preventive Medicine and Health Education & Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact