Jane Walker

5.3k citations
74 papers · 4.2k · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

    • Cancer survivorship and care 31
    • Psychiatric care and mental health services 12
    • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies 6

Jane Walker

71 papers receiving 4k citations

Peers

Jane Walker
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Oncology 1.6k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.1k
  • Clinical Psychology 598
  • Biological Psychiatry 36
  • Social Psychology 270
Replace Mary Jane Massie with:
Mary Jane Massie United States
Donna B. Greenberg United States
Suzanne C. Danhauer United States
Bong‐Jin Hahm South Korea
Benjamin David Schalet United States
Gretchen A. Brenes United States
Nor Zuraida Zainal Malaysia
Katrin Reuter Germany
Hitoshi Okamura Japan
Yvonne Nestoriuc Germany
Jane Walker relative to Mary Jane Massie United States Mary Jane Massie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.6×
Mary Jane Massie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Walker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Walker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Walker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Walker. The network helps show where Jane Walker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Walker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Walker Line = papers co-authored together Jane Walker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010417
2 2014330
3 2009280
4 2008279
5 2012244
6 2014213
7 2011175
8 2008170
9 2010149
10 2007146
11 2007128
12 2014125
13 201191
14 200988
15 201187
16 201579
17 201879
18 200672
19 202169
20 201357

About Jane Walker

Jane Walker is a scholar working on Oncology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 74 papers that have together received 4.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (31 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (12 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (10 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (7 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (6 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (6 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (1.6k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (1.1k citations), Clinical Psychology (598 citations), Biological Psychiatry (36 citations) and Social Psychology (270 citations). Jane Walker has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michael Sharpe, Gordon D. Murray, Lucy R. Wall, Christian Holm Hansen, Stefan Nicholas Symeonides, V Strong, Paul B. Martin, Rachel Waters, Alan J Carson and Jon Stone. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Psychosomatic Research, General Hospital Psychiatry, Trials, Psychological Medicine and The Lancet Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact