Jane Veys

426 citations
9 papers · 337 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Veys

9 papers receiving 296 citations

Peers

Jane Veys
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 244
  • Ophthalmology 44
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 55
  • Pharmaceutical Science 13
  • Aerospace Engineering 40
Replace Ralph Stone with:
Ralph Stone United States
Renée Garofalo United States
Holly Lorentz Canada
Cheryl Skotnitsky Australia
Arthur Back Australia
Yuri Sakane Japan
Aisling Mann United Kingdom
Rachael C. Peterson United Kingdom
Nery García‐Porta Spain
William G. Gensheimer United States
Jane Veys relative to Ralph Stone United States Ralph Stone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ralph Stone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Veys

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Veys's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Veys with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Veys more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Veys

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Veys. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Veys. The network helps show where Jane Veys may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Jane Veys, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Veys Line = papers co-authored together Jane Veys links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2002201
2 198752
3 200332
4 199230
5
Defects in disposable contact lenses can compromise ocular integrity
199210
6 20097
7 20173
8
Clinical evaluation of microfenestrated contact lenses
19931
9
[Subjective assessment of results obtained with two silicon-hydrogel contact lenses].
20061

About Jane Veys

Jane Veys is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Physiology and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 9 papers that have together received 337 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (8 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (2 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (2 papers), Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques (1 paper), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (1 paper), High-Temperature Coating Behaviors (1 paper) and Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (244 citations), Ophthalmology (44 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (55 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (13 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (40 citations). Jane Veys has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Coleman, Nicola Pritchard, Graeme P. Young, R. Mévrel, Nathan Efron, Cristina M. Schnider, Ian Davies, Anna Sulley and Kathryn Dumbleton. Their work appears in journals such as Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, International Contact Lens Clinic, Materials Science and Engineering and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact