Jane Thomas

8 papers receiving 888 citations

Jane Thomas's Hit Papers

Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates 2007 · 823 citations
8230+6+12Years since publication250500750

Peers

Jane Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 479
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 290
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 79
  • Emergency Medical Services 28
  • Surgery 141
Replace J.J. Kerssens with:
J.J. Kerssens United Kingdom
Anthony B. Armson Canada
Weiyuan Zhang China
Syam Roopnarinesingh Jamaica
Adam Sydsjö Sweden
L. Philipps United Kingdom
R. Clay Burchell United States
Kirsten Harrild United Kingdom
Krista A. Jangaard Canada
Biresaw Wassihun Ethiopia
Jane Thomas relative to J.J. Kerssens United Kingdom J.J. Kerssens's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.9×
J.J. Kerssens · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Thomas. The network helps show where Jane Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Jane Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Jane Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1
Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates
Hit paper breakdown →
2007823
2 200136
3 200235
4 201719
5 200515
6 200413
7 20017
8 20201
9 20011
10 20240

About Jane Thomas

Jane Thomas is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Emergency Medical Services, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 10 papers that have together received 950 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (2 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (2 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (2 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (2 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (1 paper), Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (1 paper) and Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (479 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (290 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (79 citations), Emergency Medical Services (28 citations) and Surgery (141 citations). Jane Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, New Zealand and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Ana Pilar Betrán, MARSDEN G. WAGNER, Jeremy Addison Lauer, Bingshun Wang, Paul Van Look, Mario Merialdi, Hossein M. Yazdi, Denise C. Landry, B F Burns and GEORGE A. CHALKIADIS. Their work appears in journals such as Pediatric Anesthesia, Histopathology, Radiographics, Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology and British Journal of Midwifery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact