Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates
Impact in
Classified as
Countries where authors are citing Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates
This map shows the geographic impact of Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates
This network shows the impact of Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates.
About Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates
This paper, published in 2007, received 801 indexed citations . Written by Ana Pilar Betrán, Mario Merialdi, Jeremy A. Lauer, Bingshun Wang, Jane Thomas, Paul Van Look and Marsden Wagner covering the research area of Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Emergency Medical Services. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Obstetrics and Gynecology (463 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (269 citations), Surgery (102 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (55 citations) and General Health Professions (50 citations). Published in Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00786.x.