Jane Scheetz

1.5k citations
32 papers · 1.0k · h-index 13

Impact in

    • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
    • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
    • Retinal and Optic Conditions
    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders

Papers in

Jane Scheetz

31 papers receiving 979 citations

Peers

Jane Scheetz
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Health Informatics 172
  • Ophthalmology 343
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 488
  • Health Information Management 61
  • Family Practice 6
Replace Susan Ostmo with:
Susan Ostmo United States
Yiyue Lou United States
Peter A. Karth United States
Lanqin Zhao China
T. Y. Alvin Liu United States
Warren Clarida United States
Fernando Korn Malerbi Brazil
Piotr Brona Poland
Geunyoung Lee Singapore
April Y. Maa United States
Jane Scheetz relative to Susan Ostmo United States Susan Ostmo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Susan Ostmo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Scheetz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Scheetz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Scheetz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Scheetz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Scheetz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Scheetz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Scheetz. The network helps show where Jane Scheetz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Scheetz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Scheetz Line = papers co-authored together Jane Scheetz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018201
2 2021175
3 2018155
4 201894
5 201964
6 202160
7 201940
8 201936
9 202030
10 202023
11 201918
12 201917
13 202113
14 20199
15 20198
16 20197
17 20197
18 20207
19 20196
20 20205

About Jane Scheetz

Jane Scheetz is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and General Health Professions, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Imaging and Analysis (9 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (8 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (8 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (8 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (6 papers), Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies (2 papers), Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation (1 paper) and Diversity and Career in Medicine (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (172 citations), Ophthalmology (343 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (488 citations), Health Information Management (61 citations) and Family Practice (6 citations). Jane Scheetz has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mingguang He, Stuart Keel, Pei Ying Lee, Zhixi Li, Richard J. MacIsaac, Wei Meng, Zhuoting Zhu, Chi Liu, Mark A. Kotowicz and Myra B. McGuinness. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, Scientific Reports, British Journal of Ophthalmology, BMJ Open and Current Eye Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact