Jane Scheetz

1.5k citations
33 papers · 1.1k · h-index 13

Impact in

    • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
    • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
    • Retinal and Optic Conditions
    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders

Papers in

Jane Scheetz

32 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Jane Scheetz
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Health Informatics 178
  • Ophthalmology 363
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 510
  • Health Information Management 59
  • Epidemiology 112
Replace Daniel S. W. Ting with:
Daniel S. W. Ting Singapore
Jocelyn Hui Lin Goh Singapore
Josef Christian Huemer United Kingdom
Yiyue Lou United States
Valentina Bellemo Singapore
Ching‐Yu Cheng Singapore
Sunny Virmani United States
Geunyoung Lee South Korea
Simon Szeto Hong Kong
Ramachandran Rajalakshmi India
Jane Scheetz relative to Daniel S. W. Ting Singapore Daniel S. W. Ting's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Daniel S. W. Ting · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Scheetz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Scheetz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Scheetz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Scheetz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Scheetz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Scheetz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Scheetz. The network helps show where Jane Scheetz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Scheetz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Scheetz Line = papers co-authored together Jane Scheetz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018209
2 2021191
3 2018155
4 201898
5 202167
6 201967
7 201942
8 201938
9 202033
10 202022
11 201919
12 201918
13 202215
14 202113
15 201910
16 20199
17 20198
18 20198
19 20207
20 20196

About Jane Scheetz

Jane Scheetz is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, Health Informatics and Rehabilitation, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (9 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (9 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (8 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (8 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (6 papers), Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies (2 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (1 paper) and Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (178 citations), Ophthalmology (363 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (510 citations), Health Information Management (59 citations) and Epidemiology (112 citations). Jane Scheetz has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, China and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Mingguang He, Stuart Keel, Pei Ying Lee, Zhixi Li, Zhuoting Zhu, Richard J. MacIsaac, Chi Liu, Wei Meng, Myra Beth McGuinness and Peter van Wijngaarden. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, Scientific Reports, BMJ Open, British Journal of Ophthalmology and Eye.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact