Jane Sampson

23 papers receiving 446 citations

Peers

Jane Sampson
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 216
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 268
  • Ecological Modeling 47
  • Genetics 255
  • Plant Science 177
Replace Suzuki Setsuko with:
Suzuki Setsuko Japan
Tetsuto Abe Japan
G. Korbecka United Kingdom
Céline Latouche-Hallé French Guiana
Jennifer L. Ison United States
Victoria J. Apsit United States
Valérie Troispoux France
Rachel B. Spigler United States
Elizabeth Friar United States
Helena C. Morais Brazil
Jane Sampson relative to Suzuki Setsuko Japan Suzuki Setsuko's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Suzuki Setsuko · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Sampson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Sampson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Sampson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Sampson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Sampson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Sampson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Sampson. The network helps show where Jane Sampson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Jane Sampson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Sampson Line = papers co-authored together Jane Sampson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200763
2 201162
3 200857
4 198952
5 199835
6 201328
7 199728
8 201520
9 201819
10 199819
11 201616
12 199012
13 201511
14 201511
15 20189
16 19909
17 20088
18 19917
19 20225
20 20165

About Jane Sampson

Jane Sampson is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 483 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic diversity and population structure (14 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (13 papers), Plant and animal studies (11 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (3 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (3 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (2 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (216 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (268 citations), Ecological Modeling (47 citations), Genetics (255 citations) and Plant Science (177 citations). Jane Sampson has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Margaret Byrne, Colin J. Yates, David Coates, Stephen D. Hopper, Michelle Waycott, Neil Gibson, S H James, Sean Stankowski, Andrew W. Douglas and J. Playford. Their work appears in journals such as Heredity, Australian Journal of Botany, Australian Systematic Botany, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society and Molecular Ecology Resources.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact