Jane Sampson

23 papers receiving 479 citations

Peers

Jane Sampson
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 222
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 270
  • Ecological Modeling 57
  • Genetics 260
  • Horticulture 5
Replace Suzuki Setsuko with:
Suzuki Setsuko Japan
Jefferey Dole United States
Tetsuto Abe Japan
Melissa A. Millar Australia
Jennifer L. Ison United States
Céline Latouche-Hallé France
Catherine A. Rushworth United States
Victoria J. Apsit United States
Valérie Troispoux France
Rachel B. Spigler United States
Jane Sampson relative to Suzuki Setsuko Japan Suzuki Setsuko's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Suzuki Setsuko · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Sampson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Sampson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Sampson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Sampson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Sampson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Sampson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Sampson. The network helps show where Jane Sampson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Jane Sampson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Sampson Line = papers co-authored together Jane Sampson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201165
2 200765
3 200859
4 198957
5 199837
6 199737
7 201329
8 199821
9 201520
10 201819
11 201616
12 199015
13 199012
14 201511
15 201511
16 199111
17 201810
18 20089
19 20225
20 20165

About Jane Sampson

Jane Sampson is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 524 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic diversity and population structure (14 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (13 papers), Plant and animal studies (11 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (3 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (3 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (2 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (222 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (270 citations), Ecological Modeling (57 citations), Genetics (260 citations) and Horticulture (5 citations). Jane Sampson has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and Indonesia. Frequent co-authors include Margaret Byrne, Colin J. Yates, David Coates, Stephen D. Hopper, Michelle Waycott, S H James, Neil Gibson, J. Playford, Andrew W. Douglas and Sean Stankowski. Their work appears in journals such as Heredity, Australian Journal of Botany, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, Australian Systematic Botany and Ecology and Evolution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact