Jane Porter

5.3k citations
30 papers · 1.2k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Porter

27 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Jane Porter
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Toxicology 66
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 53
  • Internal Medicine 42
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 51
  • Reproductive Medicine 81
Replace Sophie Dell’Aniello with:
Sophie Dell’Aniello Canada
Susan Colilla United States
H.G.M. Leufkens Netherlands
Lynn Shemanski United States
Lynda V. Wilton United Kingdom
Daniel Solomon United States
Nancy C. Santanello United States
Jamie N. Brown United States
Rajesh Sachdeva United States
Christopher Ll. Morgan United Kingdom
Jane Porter relative to Sophie Dell’Aniello Canada Sophie Dell’Aniello's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Sophie Dell’Aniello · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Porter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Porter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Porter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Porter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Porter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Porter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Porter. The network helps show where Jane Porter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Porter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Porter Line = papers co-authored together Jane Porter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1977259
2 1977160
3 1978119
4 200978
5 197671
6 197767
7 197960
8 197848
9 197846
10 198236
11 198436
12 197929
13 198127
14 198624
15 202221
16 198117
17 198117
18 198416
19 198212
20 201711

About Jane Porter

Jane Porter is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Clinical Psychology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (3 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (3 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (3 papers), Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions (2 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (2 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (2 papers), Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection (2 papers) and Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (66 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (53 citations), Internal Medicine (42 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (51 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (81 citations). Jane Porter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Hershel Jick, A. I. Morrison, Alan S. Morrison, David J. Greenblatt, Russell R. Miller, Kenneth J. Rothman, D. A. Danielson, Alexander M. Walker, Judith R. Hunter and Barbara J. Dinan. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, JAMA, Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, Annals of Internal Medicine and The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact