Jane Pitcher

26 papers receiving 692 citations

Peers

Jane Pitcher
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Gender Studies 274
  • Clinical Psychology 344
  • Sociology and Political Science 599
  • Epidemiology 169
  • Education 159
Replace Maria Laura Di Tommaso with:
Maria Laura Di Tommaso Italy
Ahmet İçduygu Türkiye
Trevon D. Logan United States
Malcolm D. Holmes United States
Daniel Coleman Canada
Jane Scoular United Kingdom
Hilary Pilkington United Kingdom
Lynn Zimmer United States
Sharyn Graham Davies New Zealand
Colin Webster United Kingdom
Jane Pitcher relative to Maria Laura Di Tommaso Italy Maria Laura Di Tommaso's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Maria Laura Di Tommaso · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Pitcher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Pitcher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Pitcher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Pitcher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Pitcher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Pitcher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Pitcher. The network helps show where Jane Pitcher may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Jane Pitcher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Pitcher Line = papers co-authored together Jane Pitcher links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009133
2 201787
3 201767
4
Moving on : graduate careers three years after graduation
199955
5 199853
6 201852
7 201749
8
Great expectations : the new diversity of graduate skills and aspirations
199646
9 200842
10 201438
11 201436
12
Minority Ethnic Participation and Achievements in Education, Training and the Labour Market
200134
13 201821
14 201919
15 200714
16
The participation of non-traditional students in higher education : summary report
199712
17 201812
18
Working out? : early graduate experiences of the labour market
199911
19 20134
20
Employers skill survey : case study - health and social care
20004

About Jane Pitcher

Jane Pitcher is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology and Education, having authored 26 papers that have together received 801 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sex work and related issues (14 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (9 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (6 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (5 papers), Education Systems and Policy (4 papers), Digital Economy and Work Transformation (4 papers), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (2 papers) and Innovative Education and Learning Practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (274 citations), Clinical Psychology (344 citations), Sociology and Political Science (599 citations), Epidemiology (169 citations) and Education (159 citations). Jane Pitcher has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Teela Sanders, Kate Purcell, Maggie O’Neill, Jane Scoular, Rosie Campbell, Stewart Cunningham, Abigail McKnight, Phil Hubbard, Peter Elias and Anne Green. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Sociology, Sexuality Research and Social Policy, Social Policy and Society, Higher Education Quarterly and Technology in Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact