Jane O’Neill
Impact in
- Neurology top 2%
- Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
- Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments
- Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Papers in
- Co-authors
- N.M.F. Murray (3 shared papers)John Newsom–Davis (2 shared papers)Hugh Gurling (4 shared papers)Stephen Spiro (1 shared paper)Colin Chalk (1 shared paper)David Curtis (4 shared papers)Jon Brynjolfsson (4 shared papers)Hannes Pétursson (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Psychiatric Genetics (2 papers)Neurology (2 papers)Brain (1 paper)Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (1 paper)The British Journal of Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIcelandIreland
In The Last Decade
Jane O’Neill
10 papers receiving 864 citations
Jane O’Neill's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Neurology 565
- Psychiatry and Mental health 105
- Genetics 148
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 91
- Biological Psychiatry 10
Countries citing papers authored by Jane O’Neill
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane O’Neill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane O’Neill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane O’Neill more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane O’Neill
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane O’Neill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane O’Neill. The network helps show where Jane O’Neill may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 22 scholars most cited alongside Jane O’Neill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | THE LAMBERT-EATON MYASTHENIC SYNDROME Hit paper breakdown → | 1988 | 467 |
| 2 | 1990 | 145 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 125 | |
| 4 | 1997 | 70 | |
| 5 | 1997 | 43 | |
| 6 | 1989 | 25 | |
| 7 | 1997 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 6 | |
| 9 | 1987 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1987 | 4 |
About Jane O’Neill
Jane O’Neill is a scholar working on Genetics, Surgery, Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 10 papers that have together received 899 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (3 papers), Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (3 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (2 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers), Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma (2 papers), Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting (2 papers), Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (1 paper) and Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (565 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (105 citations), Genetics (148 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (91 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (10 citations). Jane O’Neill has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Iceland and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include N.M.F. Murray, John Newsom–Davis, Hugh Gurling, Stephen Spiro, Colin Chalk, David Curtis, Jon Brynjolfsson, Hannes Pétursson, Patrice Murphy and Gursharan Kalsi. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatric Genetics, Neurology, Brain, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry and The British Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.