Jane Newby
Impact in
- Neurology top 5%
- Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Neurological disorders and treatments
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Papers in
-
- Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments 4
- Neurological disorders and treatments 2
- Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders 1
-
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 2
- Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder 1
- Co-authors
- Ian G. McKeith (4 shared papers)Alan Thomas (3 shared papers)David J. Burn (3 shared papers)Elise Rowan (3 shared papers)Thaı́s Minett (2 shared papers)Jonathan L. Richardson (2 shared papers)Elizabeth Littlewood (2 shared papers)John T. O’Brien (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (2 papers)Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders (1 paper)Movement Disorders (1 paper)DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jane Newby
5 papers receiving 307 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Neurology 226
- Psychiatry and Mental health 134
- Complementary and alternative medicine 61
- Neurology 33
- Pharmacology 64
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Newby
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Newby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Newby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Newby more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Newby
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Newby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Newby. The network helps show where Jane Newby may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Jane Newby, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 109 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 90 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 68 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 43 | |
| 5 | Ethical Issues and Tagging in Dementia: a Survey | 2008 | 12 |
About Jane Newby
Jane Newby is a scholar working on Neurology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology, Clinical Psychology and Physiology, having authored 5 papers that have together received 322 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (1 paper), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (1 paper), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (1 paper) and Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (226 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (134 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (61 citations), Neurology (33 citations) and Pharmacology (64 citations). Jane Newby has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ian G. McKeith, Alan Thomas, David J. Burn, Elise Rowan, Thaı́s Minett, Jonathan L. Richardson, Elizabeth Littlewood, John T. O’Brien, David A. Cousins and Sanjeet Pakrasi. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, Movement Disorders and DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.