Jane Moore
Impact in
- Pharmacy top 2%
- Obesity and Health Practices
- Religious studies top 5%
- Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment
Papers in
-
- Literature: history, themes, analysis 5
- Short Stories in Global Literature 1
- American and British Literature Analysis 1
-
- Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment 3
- Co-authors
- Catherine Belsey (2 shared papers)Fiona M Walter (1 shared paper)Jane Ogden (1 shared paper)Harry Minas (1 shared paper)H. N. COHEN (1 shared paper)John Strachan (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Women s Writing (2 papers)British Journal of General Practice (1 paper)Irish Studies Review (1 paper)Nineteenth-Century Literature (1 paper)Patient Education and Counseling (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSingapore
In The Last Decade
Jane Moore
14 papers receiving 203 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Pharmacy 74
- Religious studies 51
- Literature and Literary Theory 96
- History 69
- Gender Studies 21
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Moore
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Moore more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Moore
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Moore. The network helps show where Jane Moore may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Jane Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 127 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 112 | |
| 3 | The Feminist Reader: Essays in Gender and the Politics of Literary Criticism | 1989 | 74 |
| 4 | Ronan Kelly, Bard of Erin: The life of Thomas Moore (Dublin: Penguin Ireland, 2008) [Book Review] | 2012 | 9 |
| 5 | 2008 | 6 | |
| 6 | 1997 | 4 | |
| 7 | The satires of Thomas Moore | 2003 | 3 |
| 8 | 1999 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 11 | Thomas Moore, Anacreon, and the romantic tradition | 2013 | 1 |
| 12 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1997 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 1 |
About Jane Moore
Jane Moore is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Religious studies, History, Psychiatry and Mental health and Communication, having authored 16 papers that have together received 345 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Literature: history, themes, analysis (5 papers), Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment (3 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Short Stories in Global Literature (1 paper), American and British Literature Analysis (1 paper), Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper) and American Literature and Culture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (74 citations), Religious studies (51 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (96 citations), History (69 citations) and Gender Studies (21 citations). Jane Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Catherine Belsey, Fiona M Walter, Jane Ogden, Harry Minas, H. N. COHEN and John Strachan. Their work appears in journals such as Women s Writing, British Journal of General Practice, Irish Studies Review, Nineteenth-Century Literature and Patient Education and Counseling.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.