Jane Moore

19 papers receiving 565 citations

Peers

Jane Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Reproductive Medicine 160
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 188
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 21
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 36
  • Gastroenterology 24
Replace Anna L. Stout with:
Anna L. Stout United States
Nancy F. Woods United States
Clare Miles United Kingdom
Carolyn J. Gibson United States
Bılge Burçak Annagür Türkiye
Susan Kellogg‐Spadt United States
Rhiannon K. Patten Australia
T. J. Fahy Ireland
Jonathan L. Richardson United Kingdom
Sula Windgassen United Kingdom
Jane Moore relative to Anna L. Stout United States Anna L. Stout's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.9×
Anna L. Stout · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Moore. The network helps show where Jane Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Moore Line = papers co-authored together Jane Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011148
2 201280
3 200059
4 199856
5 201144
6 200743
7 197434
8 201831
9 201623
10 201620
11 200219
12 201615
13 200815
14 20055
15 20084
16 20142
17 20001
18 20171
19 20051
20
New ways, old ways: Aboriginal education and belonging
20121

About Jane Moore

Jane Moore is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine, Political Science and International Relations, Dermatology and Marketing, having authored 25 papers that have together received 602 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometriosis Research and Treatment (5 papers), Menstrual Health and Disorders (4 papers), American History and Culture (3 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (2 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (2 papers) and Dermatology and Skin Diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (160 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (188 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (21 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (36 citations) and Gastroenterology (24 citations). Jane Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Kennedy, Irene Tracey, Katy Vincent, Stephen Kennedy, Charlotte J. Stagg, Catherine E. Warnaby, Derek P. Jewell, David J. Barlow, Robert L. Crain and Carol S. Weisman. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Frontiers in Endocrinology and Pain Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact