Jane Minson

1.7k citations
52 papers · 1.4k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Minson

51 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Jane Minson
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 817
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 553
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 399
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 67
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 282
Replace Michael P. Gilbey with:
Michael P. Gilbey United Kingdom
Mitsuhiko Miura Japan
Timothy W. Bailey United States
J. B. Minson Australia
V. John Massari United States
Shoichiro Nosaka Japan
David D. Kline United States
Gary V. Allen Canada
Abbott J. Krieger United States
S.L. Dun United States
Jane Minson relative to Michael P. Gilbey United Kingdom Michael P. Gilbey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Michael P. Gilbey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Minson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Minson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Minson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Minson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Minson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Minson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Minson. The network helps show where Jane Minson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Minson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Minson Line = papers co-authored together Jane Minson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993144
2 1989102
3 199182
4 199669
5 199466
6 199063
7 199748
8 199742
9 198641
10 199237
11 199433
12 199232
13 199431
14 199230
15 198530
16 199429
17 199029
18 199528
19 200328
20 199428

About Jane Minson

Jane Minson is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Social Psychology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (31 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (13 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (10 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (10 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (7 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (6 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (6 papers) and Stress Responses and Cortisol (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (817 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (553 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (399 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (67 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (282 citations). Jane Minson has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and Japan. Frequent co-authors include John Chalmers, Paul M. Pilowsky, Ida J. Llewellyn‐Smith, Leonard Arnolda, Péter Somogyi, Qi‐Jian Sun, Ida Llewellyn‐Smith, Vimal Kapoor, Peter R.C. Howe and Satoshi Suzuki. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Research, Journal of Hypertension, The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology and Neuroreport.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact