Jane M. Pearson

564 citations
17 papers · 463 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Jane M. Pearson

17 papers receiving 406 citations

Peers

Jane M. Pearson
Comparison fields: 5 of 16
  • Geometry and Topology 395
  • Applied Mathematics 33
  • Modeling and Simulation 9
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 29
  • Mathematical Physics 15
Replace Douglas S. Shafer with:
Douglas S. Shafer United States
Hyam Rubinstein Australia
Vahid Parvaneh Iran
Markus Brodmann Switzerland
Mudasir Younıs India
Saud M. Alsulami Saudi Arabia
José María Sigarreta Mexico
Özgür Ege Türkiye
İshak Altun Türkiye
Zoran D‎. Mitrović Bosnia and Herzegovina
Jane M. Pearson relative to Douglas S. Shafer United States Douglas S. Shafer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Douglas S. Shafer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane M. Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane M. Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane M. Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane M. Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane M. Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane M. Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane M. Pearson. The network helps show where Jane M. Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Jane M. Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane M. Pearson Line = papers co-authored together Jane M. Pearson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 199871
2 199265
3 199039
4 199636
5 200235
6
CENTRES AND LIMIT CYCLES FOR AN EXTENDED KUKLES SYSTEM
200735
7
Transformation to Lienard form
200034
8 201024
9 199923
10 201218
11 200217
12 199616
13 199715
14 200614
15 199712
16 20087
17 20072

About Jane M. Pearson

Jane M. Pearson is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Modeling and Simulation, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Nuclear Energy and Engineering, having authored 17 papers that have together received 463 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (16 papers), Polynomial and algebraic computation (4 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models (1 paper) and Mathematical and Computational Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (395 citations), Applied Mathematics (33 citations), Modeling and Simulation (9 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (29 citations) and Mathematical Physics (15 citations). Jane M. Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Chile and Belarus. Frequent co-authors include N. G. Lloyd and Eduardo Sáez. Their work appears in journals such as Computers & Mathematics with Applications, Publicacions Matemàtiques, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics and Applied Mathematics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact