Jane Lynch

798 citations
12 papers · 593 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Lynch

12 papers receiving 572 citations

Peers

Jane Lynch
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 342
  • Cancer Research 136
  • Oncology 227
  • Genetics 204
  • Reproductive Medicine 29
Replace Sally Watts with:
Sally Watts United Kingdom
Johanna Lee United States
Bert van Geel Netherlands
Lisa Jablon United States
İsmet Taşdelen Türkiye
H Tristant France
Rosemary Wilkinson United Kingdom
Chee Goh United Kingdom
Patrice Watson United States
Monica Emanuelsson Sweden
Jane Lynch relative to Sally Watts United Kingdom Sally Watts's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.4×
Sally Watts · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Lynch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Lynch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Lynch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Lynch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Lynch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Lynch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Lynch. The network helps show where Jane Lynch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Lynch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Lynch Line = papers co-authored together Jane Lynch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 1997164
2 1991112
3 199965
4 199961
5 199433
6 199833
7 199132
8 199930
9
Inherited, familial and sporadic primary open-angle glaucoma.
200725
10 197515
11 199514
12
Genetic counseling in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: an extended family with MSH2 mutation.
19969

About Jane Lynch

Jane Lynch is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Genetics, Molecular Biology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 12 papers that have together received 593 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (6 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (5 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (3 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (1 paper), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (1 paper), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (1 paper) and Male Breast Health Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (342 citations), Cancer Research (136 citations), Oncology (227 citations), Genetics (204 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (29 citations). Jane Lynch has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Thomas C. Smyrk, Henry T. Lynch, Henry T. Lynch, Patrice Watson, Stephen J. Lanspa, Bruce M. Boman, T. C. Smyrk, Patrice Watson, Theresa Conway and Gilbert Lenoir. Their work appears in journals such as Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, Gynecologic Oncology, American Journal of Epidemiology, World Journal of Surgery and Human Mutation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact