Jane Landers

24 papers receiving 165 citations

Peers

Jane Landers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Anthropology 195
  • Archeology 18
  • Cultural Studies 75
  • Religious studies 28
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 22
Replace Christon I. Archer with:
Christon I. Archer Canada
John Thornton United States
Edward L. Cox United States
Pierre‐Yves Manguin France
Patricia E. Rubertone United States
Kathleen DuVal United States
Susan Sherratt United Kingdom
Robert Blair St. George United States
James F. Searing United States
James L. Roark United States
Jane Landers relative to Christon I. Archer Canada Christon I. Archer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Christon I. Archer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Landers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Landers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Landers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Landers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Landers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Landers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Landers. The network helps show where Jane Landers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Jane Landers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Landers Line = papers co-authored together Jane Landers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201052
2
Slaves, subjects, and subversives : blacks in colonial Latin America
200645
3 199038
4 199031
5 199716
6 198614
7 199513
8 20026
9 19986
10 20015
11
Black-Indian Interaction in Spanish Florida
19904
12 20004
13 20134
14 20063
15 20013
16 19952
17 19982
18 20151
19 20031
20 20231

About Jane Landers

Jane Landers is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Cultural Studies, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Religious studies, having authored 26 papers that have together received 256 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cuban History and Society (17 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (10 papers), Latin American and Latino Studies (10 papers), Caribbean history, culture, and politics (5 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (4 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (2 papers), Hispanic-African Historical Relations (1 paper) and Asian American and Pacific Histories (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (195 citations), Archeology (18 citations), Cultural Studies (75 citations), Religious studies (28 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (22 citations). Jane Landers has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Colombia and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include David J. Weber, Matthew Restall, Daniel C. Littlefield, Andrew J. McMichael, Paul E. Lovejoy, Gwendolyn Midlo Hall, Paul E. Hoffman, Edward L. Cox, Pablo F. Gómez and John McGrath. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Southern History, The American Historical Review, The William and Mary Quarterly, The Americas A Quarterly Review of Latin American History and Journal of American History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact