Jane Jih

30 papers receiving 911 citations

Peers

Jane Jih
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 13
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 159
  • Hepatology 62
  • General Health Professions 181
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 123
Replace Bonnie Wong with:
Bonnie Wong United States
Alberto Vélez-van-Meerbeke Colombia
Lior Rennert United States
Brandon J. Coombes United States
Christine Hassler France
E. Verbitskaya Russia
Naoki Hayashi Japan
Riccardo De Giorgi Italy
Esther A. Croes Netherlands
Jianfeng Cheng United States
Jane Jih relative to Bonnie Wong United States Bonnie Wong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.2×
Bonnie Wong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Jih

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Jih's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Jih with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Jih more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Jih

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Jih. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Jih. The network helps show where Jane Jih may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Jih, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Jih Line = papers co-authored together Jane Jih links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014194
2 2004192
3 2002149
4 201898
5 200461
6 202253
7 201637
8 201624
9 201522
10 201913
11 201811
12 20149
13 20238
14 20217
15 20207
16 20237
17 20205
18 20204
19 20174
20 20184

About Jane Jih

Jane Jih is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Pharmacy, Molecular Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 30 papers that have together received 926 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Participatory Visual Research Methods (4 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (4 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (2 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (2 papers) and Physical Activity and Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (13 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (159 citations), Hepatology (62 citations), General Health Professions (181 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (123 citations). Jane Jih has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Saudi Arabia and Rwanda. Frequent co-authors include Michael E. Ragozzino, Tung T. Nguyen, Eric Vittinghoff, Janice Y. Tsoh, Yoshimi Fukuoka, Winston Tseng, Melinda S. Bender, Arnab Mukherjea, Alka M. Kanaya and W. John Boscardin. Their work appears in journals such as Patient Education and Counseling, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Journal of General Internal Medicine, Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities and Preventing Chronic Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact