Jane H. Thomas

21 papers receiving 856 citations

Peers

Jane H. Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 43
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 93
  • Microbiology 113
  • Epidemiology 362
  • Occupational Therapy 42
Replace P. J. HARPER with:
P. J. HARPER United Kingdom
John A. Sellick United States
Mana Golsorkhi United Kingdom
Melissa K. Schaefer United States
Adrijana Gombosev United States
Jerome A. Boscia United States
Katherine Haffenreffer United States
Jackson Musuuza United States
Malin Inghammar Sweden
Julie D. Lankiewicz United States
Jane H. Thomas relative to P. J. HARPER United Kingdom P. J. HARPER's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.5×
P. J. HARPER · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane H. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane H. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane H. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane H. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane H. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane H. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane H. Thomas. The network helps show where Jane H. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane H. Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane H. Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Jane H. Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014170
2 2020110
3 201090
4 201877
5 201071
6 200954
7 201049
8 199646
9 200846
10 201639
11 201034
12 202033
13 201621
14 201914
15 20168
16 20217
17 20076
18 20146
19 20254
20 20063

About Jane H. Thomas

Jane H. Thomas is a scholar working on Microbiology, Epidemiology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pharmacology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 21 papers that have together received 889 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (3 papers), Burkholderia infections and melioidosis (3 papers), Bacterial Infections and Vaccines (3 papers), Nosocomial Infections in ICU (2 papers), Infection Control and Ventilation (1 paper), Fungal Infections and Studies (1 paper), Adrenal Hormones and Disorders (1 paper) and Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (43 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (93 citations), Microbiology (113 citations), Epidemiology (362 citations) and Occupational Therapy (42 citations). Jane H. Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Hong Kong and United States. Frequent co-authors include Dianne P. Stephens, Joshua Saul Davis, Stephen J Conaty, Michael Bailey, Allen C. Cheng, Mary R Bliss, Nicholas M. Anstey, Linda M Ward, Stephen James Fowler and Jason A. Roberts. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Care and Resuscitation, Journal of Critical Care, Intensive Care Medicine, Critical Care Medicine and Vaccine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact