Jane Green

3.9k citations
66 papers · 2.2k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Green

62 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Jane Green
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
  • Political Science and International Relations 1.2k
  • Communication 240
  • Gender Studies 221
  • Strategy and Management 286
  • Sociology and Political Science 556
Replace Christopher D. Johnston with:
Christopher D. Johnston United States
Gijs Schumacher Netherlands
Richard Boyd United States
Mark Peffley United States
Gabriel Lenz United States
Kenneth M. Goldstein United States
Asbjørn Sonne Nørgaard Denmark
Paul Goren United States
Robert Klemmensen Denmark
Stefano Bartolini Italy
Jane Green relative to Christopher D. Johnston United States Christopher D. Johnston's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Christopher D. Johnston · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Green

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Green's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Green with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Green more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Green

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Green. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Green. The network helps show where Jane Green may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Green, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Green Line = papers co-authored together Jane Green links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012359
2 2008287
3 1981194
4 2007161
5 201779
6 201174
7 201974
8 201172
9
Report of the Inquiry into the 2015 British general election opinion polls
201667
10 201162
11 201144
12 201242
13 201840
14 201738
15 199238
16 202137
17 201936
18 201136
19 199335
20 201733

About Jane Green

Jane Green is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management, Gender Studies and Plant Science, having authored 66 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (30 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (26 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (11 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (9 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (7 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (7 papers), Policy Transfer and Learning (4 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (1.2k citations), Communication (240 citations), Gender Studies (221 citations), Strategy and Management (286 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (556 citations). Jane Green has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Will Jennings, Sara B. Hobolt, Jerald M. Jellison, James Adams, Caitlin Milazzo, Christopher Prosser, Edward Fieldhouse, Jonathan Mellon, John Danesh and Paul M. Matthews. Their work appears in journals such as Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, British Journal of Political Science, Electoral Studies, Political Studies and Political Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact