Jane Flanagan

56 papers receiving 569 citations

Peers

Jane Flanagan
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 31
  • Research and Theory 15
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 40
  • General Health Professions 107
  • Family Practice 7
Replace Eva Sahlberg‐Blom with:
Eva Sahlberg‐Blom Sweden
İmatullah Akyar Türkiye
Jean Burley Moore United States
Susan W. Wesmiller United States
Myriam Skrutkowski Canada
Debra Jeffs United Kingdom
Duilio Fiorenzo Manara Italy
Cathy Shipman United Kingdom
Janice C. Hallal United States
Solveig M. Lundgren Sweden
Jane Flanagan relative to Eva Sahlberg‐Blom Sweden Eva Sahlberg‐Blom's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.9×
Eva Sahlberg‐Blom · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Flanagan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Flanagan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Flanagan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Flanagan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Flanagan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Flanagan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Flanagan. The network helps show where Jane Flanagan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Flanagan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Flanagan Line = papers co-authored together Jane Flanagan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201654
2 201652
3 200942
4 200533
5 201932
6 202132
7 201824
8 202123
9 201020
10 201518
11 200917
12 202016
13 200916
14 201716
15 201116
16 202214
17 201213
18 201613
19 200611
20 202110

About Jane Flanagan

Jane Flanagan is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 59 papers that have together received 609 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (7 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (6 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (5 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (3 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (3 papers) and Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (31 citations), Research and Theory (15 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (40 citations), General Health Professions (107 citations) and Family Practice (7 citations). Jane Flanagan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Kathryn Post, Rebecca R. Hill, Diane L. Carroll, Dorothy Jones, Catherine Y. Read, Glenys A. Hamilton, Mary E. Duffy, Kelly D. Stamp, Karleen Habin and Amanda Bulette Coakley. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, Nursing Science Quarterly, Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing, JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration and Rehabilitation Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact