Jane Fellows
Impact in
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- RNA Research and Splicing
- RNA modifications and cancer
- DNA Repair Mechanisms
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Papers in
-
- Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics 8
- DNA Repair Mechanisms 3
- RNA Research and Splicing 3
- Fungal and yeast genetics research 2
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 2
- RNA modifications and cancer 1
- Protein purification and stability 1
- Co-authors
- Jesper Qualmann Svejstrup (7 shared papers)Paul Tempst (4 shared papers)Hediye Erdjument‐Bromage (4 shared papers)Yang Li (3 shared papers)Gabriel Otero (2 shared papers)Thérèse de Bizemont (2 shared papers)Birgitte Ø. Wittschieben (2 shared papers)Arnold I. Coffer (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- The EMBO Journal (2 papers)Molecular Cell (2 papers)Nature (1 paper)Biochemical Journal (1 paper)Journal of Biological Chemistry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Jane Fellows
10 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Molecular Biology 1.4k
- Cancer Research 97
- Aging 12
- Cell Biology 91
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 92
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Fellows
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Fellows's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Fellows with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Fellows more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Fellows
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Fellows. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Fellows. The network helps show where Jane Fellows may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Fellows, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 418 | |
| 2 | 1999 | 398 | |
| 3 | 1997 | 200 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 186 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 126 | |
| 6 | 1997 | 100 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 59 | |
| 8 | 1979 | 23 | |
| 9 | 1991 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 9 |
About Jane Fellows
Jane Fellows is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biochemistry, Hepatology, Plant Science and Epidemiology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (8 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (3 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (3 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (2 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (2 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (1 paper), Plant Molecular Biology Research (1 paper) and Protein purification and stability (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (1.4k citations), Cancer Research (97 citations), Aging (12 citations), Cell Biology (91 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (92 citations). Jane Fellows has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jesper Qualmann Svejstrup, Paul Tempst, Hediye Erdjument‐Bromage, Yang Li, Gabriel Otero, Thérèse de Bizemont, Birgitte Ø. Wittschieben, Arnold I. Coffer, Richard Dean Wood and Elizabeth L. Evans. Their work appears in journals such as The EMBO Journal, Molecular Cell, Nature, Biochemical Journal and Journal of Biological Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.