Jane E. Warren

2.7k citations
29 papers · 2.1k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Jane E. Warren

28 papers receiving 2k citations

Peers

Jane E. Warren
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.6k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 248
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 236
  • Social Psychology 230
  • Rehabilitation 51
Replace Michael Schwartze with:
Michael Schwartze Netherlands
Benjamin Morillon France
Andreas Hennenlotter Germany
Deborah J. Hellawell United Kingdom
Wiebke J. Trost Switzerland
Hana Burianová Australia
Patrick Bermudez Canada
Roel Jonkers Netherlands
Federica Lucchelli Italy
David H. Ludlow United States
Jane E. Warren relative to Michael Schwartze Netherlands Michael Schwartze's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Michael Schwartze · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane E. Warren

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane E. Warren's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane E. Warren with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane E. Warren more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane E. Warren

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane E. Warren. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane E. Warren. The network helps show where Jane E. Warren may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane E. Warren, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane E. Warren Line = papers co-authored together Jane E. Warren links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006235
2 2013231
3 2005230
4 2006175
5 2009164
6 2007122
7 2007115
8 2013104
9 200699
10 201075
11 201374
12 201068
13 201063
14 200962
15 200356
16 201554
17 201433
18 202029
19 201220
20 201519

About Jane E. Warren

Jane E. Warren is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology, Social Psychology and Neurology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (16 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (6 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (2 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (2 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (1 paper), Reading and Literacy Development (1 paper) and Emotion and Mood Recognition (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.6k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (248 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (236 citations), Social Psychology (230 citations) and Rehabilitation (51 citations). Jane E. Warren has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Sophie Kerttu Scott, Jason D. Warren, Richard J. S. Wise, Federico Turkheimer, Disa Anna Sauter, Matthew A. Lambon Ralph, Jenny Crinion, Zoe Victoria Joan Woodhead, Sonia L. E. Brownsett and Robert Leech. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Cerebral Cortex, Brain, Movement Disorders and Aphasiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact