Jane E. Mendez

23 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Jane E. Mendez
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Reproductive Medicine 213
  • Cancer Research 320
  • Oncology 513
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 379
  • Family Practice 17
Replace Alessia Levaggi with:
Alessia Levaggi Italy
Uwe Güth Switzerland
Elizabeth Z. Naftalis United States
Shulamith Rizel Israel
Janine Margaret Lombard Australia
Kristine Torres‐Lockhart United States
Ashley Ford Haggerty United States
Jenny Lester United States
Renate Eckel Germany
Carolina Marini Italy
Jane E. Mendez relative to Alessia Levaggi Italy Alessia Levaggi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.5×
Alessia Levaggi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane E. Mendez

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane E. Mendez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane E. Mendez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane E. Mendez more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane E. Mendez

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane E. Mendez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane E. Mendez. The network helps show where Jane E. Mendez may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane E. Mendez, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane E. Mendez Line = papers co-authored together Jane E. Mendez links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005374
2 2006324
3 2006115
4 2017107
5 2007105
6 201081
7 201781
8 200959
9 200632
10 201129
11 200415
12 200514
13 201913
14 20079
15 20199
16 20044
17 20042
18 20092
19 20052
20 20232

About Jane E. Mendez

Jane E. Mendez is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (11 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (5 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (3 papers), Lymphatic System and Diseases (2 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers), Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases (2 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (2 papers) and Ovarian function and disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (213 citations), Cancer Research (320 citations), Oncology (513 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (379 citations) and Family Practice (17 citations). Jane E. Mendez has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Henry M. Kuerer, Amber Azniv Guth, Nina A. Bickell, Soji F. Oluwole, Deborah Schrag, Jason J. Wang, Henry P. Godfrey, Karen L. Hiotis, Michael D. Stone and Maureen T. Kavanah. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Surgical Oncology, The American Journal of Surgery, Journal of the American College of Surgeons, The American Surgeon and Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact