Jane Durga

31 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Jane Durga's Hit Papers

Effect of 3-year folic acid supplementation on cognitive function in older adults in the FACIT trial: a randomised, double blind, controlled trial 2007 · 607 citations
6070+6+12Years since publication200400600

Peers

Jane Durga
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Rheumatology 629
  • Sensory Systems 92
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 301
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 150
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 21
Replace Fei Ma with:
Fei Ma China
F. Brian Gibberd United Kingdom
F. Maioli Italy
Ti Lu Taiwan
Tahir Kurtuluş Yoldaş Türkiye
Babak Hooshmand Sweden
Sharon G. Curhan United States
Almudena Areosa Sastre Spain
Jane Durga relative to Fei Ma China Fei Ma's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40×46×
Fei Ma · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Durga

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Durga's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Durga with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Durga more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Durga

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Durga. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Durga. The network helps show where Jane Durga may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Durga, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Durga Line = papers co-authored together Jane Durga links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Effect of 3-year folic acid supplementation on cognitive function in older adults in the FACIT trial: a randomised, double blind, controlled trial
Hit paper breakdown →
2007607
2 2007130
3 2007117
4 200469
5 200554
6 200548
7 201745
8 200443
9 201141
10 201036
11 200934
12 201034
13 200832
14 201131
15 200724
16 202024
17 200721
18 200520
19 202419
20 200517

About Jane Durga

Jane Durga is a scholar working on Rheumatology, Hematology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Cognitive Neuroscience and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Folate and B Vitamins Research (21 papers), Iron Metabolism and Disorders (5 papers), Fatty Acid Research and Health (3 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (2 papers), Medical research and treatments (1 paper), Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (1 paper), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (1 paper) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rheumatology (629 citations), Sensory Systems (92 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (301 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (150 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (21 citations). Jane Durga has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Petra Verhoef, Evert G. Schouten, Frans J. Kok, Martin P.J. van Boxtel, Jelle Jolles, Mira Katan, Michiel L. Bots, Lucien J. C. Anteunis, Ingeborg A. Brouwer and Carla Dullemeijer. Their work appears in journals such as Atherosclerosis, The Lancet, The journal of nutrition health & aging, British Journal Of Nutrition and Journal of Nutrition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact