Jane Day

416 citations
23 papers · 295 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Day

21 papers receiving 245 citations

Peers

Jane Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Geometry and Topology 153
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 151
  • Algebra and Number Theory 39
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 24
  • Computational Mathematics 3
Replace Duane W. DeTemple with:
Duane W. DeTemple United States
M Slater United Kingdom
Robert Leslie Ellis United States
David Mead United States
Yue-Ping Jiang China
Mordechai Lewin Israel
Dorin Andrica Romania
Calvin T. Long United States
Zbigniew Semadeni Poland
Walter D. Morris United States
Jane Day relative to Duane W. DeTemple United States Duane W. DeTemple's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Duane W. DeTemple · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Day. The network helps show where Jane Day may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Jane Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Day Line = papers co-authored together Jane Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200866
2 200747
3 198835
4 197127
5 200720
6 199814
7 198813
8 198110
9 19919
10
Teaching Linear Algebra: What are the Questions?
19999
11 20017
12 19726
13 19676
14 19676
15 19675
16 20015
17 20104
18 20082
19 19661
20 19741

About Jane Day

Jane Day is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics, Education and Algebra and Number Theory, having authored 23 papers that have together received 295 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Matrix Theory and Algorithms (4 papers), Graph theory and applications (3 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (3 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (3 papers), semigroups and automata theory (3 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (2 papers), Mathematics Education and Programs (2 papers) and Advanced Topology and Set Theory (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (153 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (151 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (39 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (24 citations) and Computational Mathematics (3 citations). Jane Day has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Wasin So, Dan Kalman, Robert C. Thompson, A. D. Wallace, Christopher R. Palmer, Nigel Burrows, Karl H. Hofmann, Olajumoke Sule, Lorna Willocks and Stanley P. Franklin. Their work appears in journals such as Semigroup Forum, Linear Algebra and its Applications, Mathematische Annalen, The Elementary School Journal and Pacific Journal of Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact