Jane Cottingham

23 papers receiving 390 citations

Peers

Jane Cottingham
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Microbiology 86
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 151
  • General Health Professions 177
  • Gender Studies 52
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 146
Replace Hind Khattab with:
Hind Khattab Egypt
Anna Newton-Levinson United States
N Dickson New Zealand
Nuriye Sahin‐Hodoglugil United States
W D Mosher United States
Naomi Lince-Deroche United States
Beth A. Brown United States
Ninuk Widyantoro United Kingdom
Joanna Paula Cordero Switzerland
Mi-Suk Kang United States
Jane Cottingham relative to Hind Khattab Egypt Hind Khattab's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Hind Khattab · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Cottingham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Cottingham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Cottingham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Cottingham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Cottingham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Cottingham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Cottingham. The network helps show where Jane Cottingham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Jane Cottingham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Cottingham Line = papers co-authored together Jane Cottingham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199260
2 201244
3 200841
4 200140
5 201039
6 201531
7 201427
8 200026
9 200219
10 200817
11 200716
12 200913
13 201311
14 20188
15 19936
16 20115
17 20155
18 20194
19 20173
20 20103

About Jane Cottingham

Jane Cottingham is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Gender Studies and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 24 papers that have together received 422 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human Rights and Development (7 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (7 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (7 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (4 papers), International Human Rights and Reproductive Law (4 papers), Sex work and related issues (2 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (2 papers) and Health and Conflict Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (86 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (151 citations), General Health Professions (177 citations), Gender Studies (52 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (146 citations). Jane Cottingham has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include David J. Hunter, Eszter Kismödi, Sofia Gruskin, Adrienne Germain, Alice Miller, P.F.A. Van Look, Paul Hunt, Nuriye Ortaylı, Ornella Lincetto and Marge Berer. Their work appears in journals such as Reproductive Health Matters, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Gender & Development and Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact