Jane Chung

58 papers receiving 733 citations

Peers

Jane Chung
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Demography 179
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 43
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 25
  • General Health Professions 175
  • Health 49
Replace Amanda Lo with:
Amanda Lo Australia
Shomir Chaudhuri United States
Niina Keränen Finland
Brian Hensel United States
Maria Giatsi Clausen United Kingdom
Adriano Pasqualotti Brazil
Vera Stara Italy
Tsai-Hsuan Tsai Taiwan
Stephanie Jansen-Kosterink Netherlands
Noelannah Neubauer Canada
Jane Chung relative to Amanda Lo Australia Amanda Lo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Amanda Lo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Chung

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Chung's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Chung with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Chung more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Chung

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Chung. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Chung. The network helps show where Jane Chung may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Chung, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Chung Line = papers co-authored together Jane Chung links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201598
2 201258
3 201444
4 201939
5 201629
6 201428
7 201628
8 201427
9 202126
10 201326
11 202226
12 201625
13 202025
14 201724
15 201819
16 201718
17 202116
18 202115
19 202015
20 201414

About Jane Chung

Jane Chung is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Demography, Health, Transportation and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 59 papers that have together received 760 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Technology Use by Older Adults (12 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (10 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (10 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (6 papers), Urban Transport and Accessibility (6 papers), Older Adults Driving Studies (4 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (4 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (179 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (43 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (25 citations), General Health Professions (175 citations) and Health (49 citations). Jane Chung has collaborated with scholars based in United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include George Demiris, Hilaire J. Thompson, Blaine Reeder, Tae Wha Lee, Thai Le, Shomir Chaudhuri, Jonathan Joe, David C. Wheeler, Jongwon Lee and Pamela Parsons. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Older People Nursing, Innovation in Aging, Informatics for Health and Social Care, Journal of Gerontological Nursing and Journal of Applied Gerontology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact