Jane Campbell
Impact in
- Safety Research top 2%
- Disability Rights and Representation
Papers in
-
- American and British Literature Analysis 2
- Themes in Literature Analysis 2
- Co-authors
- Michael Oliver (1 shared paper)Ian A. Hendry (1 shared paper)Peter Beresford (1 shared paper)Kenneth W. Warren (1 shared paper)Peta Tancred (1 shared paper)Amanda Fallin‐Bennett (1 shared paper)Eileen K. Fry-Bowers (1 shared paper)Robert B. Stepto (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Disability & Society (2 papers)American Literature (1 paper)Journal of Neurocytology (1 paper)Journal of Professional Nursing (1 paper)Political Science Quarterly (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jane Campbell
13 papers receiving 644 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- Safety Research 173
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 23
- Public Administration 59
- Developmental Neuroscience 67
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 208
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Campbell
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Campbell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Campbell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Campbell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Campbell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Campbell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Campbell. The network helps show where Jane Campbell may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Jane Campbell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Disability Politics: Understanding Our Past, Changing Our Future | 1996 | 344 |
| 2 | 1976 | 274 | |
| 3 | 1994 | 68 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 19 | |
| 6 | 1989 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 11 | |
| 8 | Room for Women: A Case Study in the Sociology of Organizations | 1992 | 11 |
| 9 | 1987 | 7 | |
| 10 | Queer media images : LGBT perspectives | 2013 | 2 |
| 11 | Nora Foster Stovel, Margaret Drabble: Symbolic Moralist | 1990 | 2 |
| 12 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1988 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1988 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 0 | |
| 16 | 1962 | 0 |
About Jane Campbell
Jane Campbell is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Surgery and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 16 papers that have together received 782 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American and British Literature Analysis (2 papers), Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction (2 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (2 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (1 paper), Nerve injury and regeneration (1 paper), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (1 paper), Nosocomial Infections in ICU (1 paper) and Nursing Roles and Practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (173 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (23 citations), Public Administration (59 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (67 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (208 citations). Jane Campbell has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Oliver, Ian A. Hendry, Peter Beresford, Kenneth W. Warren, Peta Tancred, Amanda Fallin‐Bennett, Eileen K. Fry-Bowers and Robert B. Stepto. Their work appears in journals such as Disability & Society, American Literature, Journal of Neurocytology, Journal of Professional Nursing and Political Science Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.