Jane Campbell

14 papers receiving 702 citations

Peers

Jane Campbell
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Safety Research 196
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 22
  • Developmental Neuroscience 73
  • Public Administration 57
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 230
Replace Jackie Leach Scully with:
Jackie Leach Scully Australia
Colleen McLaughlin United Kingdom
Frances A. Maher United States
Robert Jackson United States
Dennis Marsden United Kingdom
Kathryn A. McDermott United States
J. John Harris United Kingdom
Lesley A. Schimanski United States
Stephen Gilson United States
James P. Bennett United States
Jane Campbell relative to Jackie Leach Scully Australia Jackie Leach Scully's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
Jackie Leach Scully · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Campbell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Campbell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Campbell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Campbell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Campbell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Campbell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Campbell. The network helps show where Jane Campbell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Jane Campbell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Campbell Line = papers co-authored together Jane Campbell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1
Disability Politics: Understanding Our Past, Changing Our Future
1996389
2 1976300
3 199472
4 201728
5 200819
6 198718
7 198916
8 200214
9
Room for Women: A Case Study in the Sociology of Organizations
199213
10
Queer media images : LGBT perspectives
20134
11 19883
12
Nora Foster Stovel, Margaret Drabble: Symbolic Moralist
19902
13 20132
14 19881
15 20061
16 20060
17 19620

About Jane Campbell

Jane Campbell is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Surgery and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 17 papers that have together received 882 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American and British Literature Analysis (2 papers), Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction (2 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (2 papers), Disability Rights and Representation (1 paper), Asian Culture and Media Studies (1 paper), Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (1 paper), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (1 paper) and Sex work and related issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (196 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (22 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (73 citations), Public Administration (57 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (230 citations). Jane Campbell has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Oliver, Ian A. Hendry, Peter Beresford, Kenneth W. Warren, Peta Tancred, Robert B. Stepto, Amanda Fallin‐Bennett and Eileen K. Fry-Bowers. Their work appears in journals such as Disability & Society, Critical Care Nursing Quarterly, American Literature, Journal of Professional Nursing and International fiction review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact