Jane C. Schroeder

46 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Jane C. Schroeder
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 254
  • Cancer Research 345
  • Oncology 529
  • Reproductive Medicine 144
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 192
Replace R N Hoover with:
R N Hoover United States
Yu Tang Gao China
Antonella Zucchetto Italy
Marco Montella Italy
Mark F. Wildhagen Netherlands
Haiyan Wang China
Felice Crocetto Italy
M. Jain Canada
Kimberly A. Lowe United States
Saeedeh Salimi Iran
Jane C. Schroeder relative to R N Hoover United States R N Hoover's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
R N Hoover · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane C. Schroeder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane C. Schroeder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane C. Schroeder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane C. Schroeder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane C. Schroeder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane C. Schroeder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane C. Schroeder. The network helps show where Jane C. Schroeder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane C. Schroeder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane C. Schroeder Line = papers co-authored together Jane C. Schroeder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005256
2 2008245
3 2006229
4 2010192
5 2004102
6 200785
7 200669
8 200768
9 200662
10 200861
11 200058
12 200156
13 200756
14 200651
15 200649
16 200749
17 200542
18 201140
19 200835
20 199735

About Jane C. Schroeder

Jane C. Schroeder is a scholar working on Oncology, Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Risks and Factors (7 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (5 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (4 papers), Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism (4 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (4 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (4 papers) and Estrogen and related hormone effects (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (254 citations), Cancer Research (345 citations), Oncology (529 citations), Reproductive Medicine (144 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (192 citations). Jane C. Schroeder has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Donna D. Baird, Jochen Klenk, Hans Concin, Willi Oberaigner, Hanno Ulmer, Kilian Rapp, S. K. Weiland, Robert S. Sandler, Jessie A. Satia and Christopher F. Martin. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer Causes & Control, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, Environmental Health Perspectives, American Journal of Epidemiology and American Journal of Industrial Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact