Jane Britten

15 papers receiving 481 citations

Peers

Jane Britten
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Epidemiology 290
  • General Health Professions 109
  • Pharmacy 11
  • Applied Psychology 15
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 18
Replace Susan L. Wilhelm with:
Susan L. Wilhelm United States
Lauren Rockliffe United Kingdom
Harriet Batista Ferrer United Kingdom
Tengku Alina Tengku Ismail Malaysia
John Hubley United Kingdom
Cedric Harville United States
Claire Jones United Kingdom
Usree Kirtania United States
Marion E. Hare United States
Guedy Arniella United States
Jane Britten relative to Susan L. Wilhelm United States Susan L. Wilhelm's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Susan L. Wilhelm · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Britten

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Britten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Britten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Britten more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Britten

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Britten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Britten. The network helps show where Jane Britten may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Jane Britten, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Britten Line = papers co-authored together Jane Britten links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2012132
2 200991
3 201081
4 200960
5 201340
6 200629
7 200620
8
Breastfeeding rates are increasing in Scotland.
200117
9 200615
10 19997
11 20137
12
Monitoring breastfeeding rates and setting local targets: the Glasgow experience.
20016
13
Breastfeeding in Scotland--statistical sources.
20002
14
Midwives as mothers. Breastfeeding and returning to work.
20001
15 20021

About Jane Britten

Jane Britten is a scholar working on Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Applied Psychology, Statistics and Probability and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 15 papers that have together received 509 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (11 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (4 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper) and Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Epidemiology (290 citations), General Health Professions (109 citations), Pharmacy (11 citations), Applied Psychology (15 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (18 citations). Jane Britten has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Pat Hoddinott, Rhona J. McInnes, Leone C. A. Craig, Roisin Pill, Alison Avenell, David Godden, David Michael Tappin, Gordon J. Prescott, Anne Ludbrook and D. Tappin. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, BMJ Open, International Breastfeeding Journal and BMC Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact