Jane Bailey

46 papers receiving 373 citations

Peers

Jane Bailey
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Gender Studies 165
  • Communication 80
  • Medical Terminology 1
  • Law 46
  • Sociology and Political Science 190
Replace Jeffrey Lane with:
Jeffrey Lane United States
Eva Lievens Belgium
Kevin F. Steinmetz United States
Nora A. Draper United States
Ganaele Langlois Canada
Stine Eckert United States
Paromita Pain United States
Ray Surette United States
Helen Thornham United Kingdom
Israel Waismel-Manor Israel
Jane Bailey relative to Jeffrey Lane United States Jeffrey Lane's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Jeffrey Lane · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Bailey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Bailey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Bailey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Bailey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Bailey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Bailey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Bailey. The network helps show where Jane Bailey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Jane Bailey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Bailey Line = papers co-authored together Jane Bailey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013104
2 201436
3 201129
4 201924
5 200718
6 201517
7 202116
8 202115
9 201312
10
What's so
200710
11 201410
12 201710
13 20169
14
What's So "Cyber" about It?: Reflections on Cyberfeminism's Contribution to Legal Studies
20078
15 20088
16 20217
17 20167
18
A Perfect Storm: How the Online Environment, Social Norms and Law Shape Girls' Lives
20156
19 20126
20 20215

About Jane Bailey

Jane Bailey is a scholar working on Law, Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Artificial Intelligence and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 56 papers that have together received 438 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender, Feminism, and Media (14 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (10 papers), Law in Society and Culture (9 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (9 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (9 papers), Social Media and Politics (8 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Law (7 papers) and Freedom of Expression and Defamation (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (165 citations), Communication (80 citations), Medical Terminology (1 citation), Law (46 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (190 citations). Jane Bailey has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Jacquelyn Burkell, Valerie Steeves, Priscilla M. Regan, Nicola Henry, Asher Flynn, Leslie Regan Shade, Graham Reynolds, Graham Reynolds, Ian R. Kerr and Chandell Gosse. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Communication Inquiry, International Data Privacy Law, Ethics and Information Technology, Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society and International Journal of Qualitative Methods.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact