Jane A. Ingram
Impact in
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.5%
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
- Pharmacology top 0.5%
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Papers in
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 45
- Pharmacology 25
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 23
- Co-authors
- Helen E. Gruber (58 shared papers)Edward N. Hanley (57 shared papers)Gretchen L. Hoelscher (37 shared papers)H. James Norton (17 shared papers)Kelly Leslie (7 shared papers)Synthia Bethea (9 shared papers)Natalia Zinchenko (12 shared papers)Daniel E. Davis (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Spine (14 papers)The Spine Journal (11 papers)Experimental and Molecular Pathology (7 papers)Arthritis Research & Therapy (6 papers)Journal of Orthopaedic Research® (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSweden
In The Last Decade
Jane A. Ingram
60 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.4k
- Pharmacology 1.0k
- Rheumatology 396
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 203
- Surgery 632
Countries citing papers authored by Jane A. Ingram
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane A. Ingram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane A. Ingram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane A. Ingram more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane A. Ingram
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane A. Ingram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane A. Ingram. The network helps show where Jane A. Ingram may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane A. Ingram, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 184 | |
| 2 | 2002 | 160 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 110 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 104 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 83 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 76 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 69 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 66 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 59 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 57 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 51 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 49 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 49 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 45 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 45 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 45 | |
| 17 | 2009 | 43 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 41 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 41 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 40 |
About Jane A. Ingram
Jane A. Ingram is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pharmacology, Surgery, Rheumatology and Molecular Biology, having authored 61 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (45 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (23 papers), Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (12 papers), Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties (7 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (6 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (5 papers), Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (5 papers) and Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.4k citations), Pharmacology (1.0k citations), Rheumatology (396 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (203 citations) and Surgery (632 citations). Jane A. Ingram has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Helen E. Gruber, Edward N. Hanley, Gretchen L. Hoelscher, H. James Norton, Kelly Leslie, Synthia Bethea, Natalia Zinchenko, Daniel E. Davis, Tracy Johnson and Laura S. Phieffer. Their work appears in journals such as Spine, The Spine Journal, Experimental and Molecular Pathology, Arthritis Research & Therapy and Journal of Orthopaedic Research®.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.