Jan Kaczér

915 citations
58 papers · 719 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Jan Kaczér

54 papers receiving 635 citations

Peers

Jan Kaczér
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 296
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 474
  • Condensed Matter Physics 64
  • Materials Chemistry 143
  • Structural Biology 7
Replace Richard Gemperle with:
Richard Gemperle Czechia
Joseph Seiden France
H. Hurdequint France
Ed Ghahramani Canada
C. H. W. Swüste Netherlands
E. L. Boyd United States
R. A. Altman United States
Benjamin Colburn Crooker United States
F. Meloni Italy
Frans J. A. M. Greidanus Netherlands
Jan Kaczér relative to Richard Gemperle Czechia Richard Gemperle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×
Richard Gemperle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jan Kaczér

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Kaczér's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Kaczér with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Kaczér more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Kaczér

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Kaczér. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Kaczér. The network helps show where Jan Kaczér may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Jan Kaczér, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jan Kaczér Line = papers co-authored together Jan Kaczér links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196064
2 196162
3 197450
4 196349
5 196744
6 197033
7 195728
8 196127
9 196827
10 195921
11 196620
12 195517
13 196017
14 195815
15 196014
16 195913
17 195211
18 196611
19 197211
20 198711

About Jan Kaczér

Jan Kaczér is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Materials Chemistry and Structural Biology, having authored 58 papers that have together received 719 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (36 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (26 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (5 papers), Magnetic Properties of Alloys (4 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (3 papers), Multiferroics and related materials (3 papers), Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (2 papers) and Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (296 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (474 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (64 citations), Materials Chemistry (143 citations) and Structural Biology (7 citations). Jan Kaczér has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Richard Gemperle, Martin Zelený, M. Polcarová, Zdenek V. Hauptman, I. Tomás̆, František Kroupa, Z. S̆roubek, J. Cock Lodder, K. Žďánský and Jan Fousek. Their work appears in journals such as physica status solidi (a), physica status solidi (b), IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Journal of Applied Physics and Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact